Security Articles/Blogs From Our Members
We welcome comments to any of our blog entries by any visitor to the website.
Posts in Hotel Security

It is the Security Source Online Blog that distinguishes this website from those that are merely security services directories. SSO provides usable information provided by our Security Professionals.

Security Assessment
The security professionals that oversee SSO, as well as the SSO Members, ensure that blogs will be posted that are reflective of the security information and loss prevention issues of the day. Each posted blog invites discussion. Visitors to Security Source Online will continue to find a wide range on informational articles that address the safety and security of a wide range of topics. Security Source Online will be responsive to the topics of the day and the ever changing risk environment. Contact SSO for discussion topics.
 
Although blog entries are restricted to SSO members. visitors are encouraged to contact us and suggest blog topics for our members. ANY VISITOR MAY RESPOND OR COMMENT ON ANY BLOG ENTRY AND WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO DO SO. You will find that our members accumulatively, have a wide range of diverse expertise and can address almost any topic of interest.
Security Source Online's RSS FeedClick here to subscribe to Security Source Online's RSS Feed.
June 7, 2011

The Wisdom of Vertical Marketing Within the Security Industry

Many security companies have discovered the wisdom of the vertical marketing of products and services. Vertical marketing is good for the purveyor and it is good for the customer for a number of reasons. Some companies’ products and services naturally fall into the vertical marketing framework such as those companies that cater exclusively to the healthcare industry, the food processing industry and the education industry. On the other hand those of us that provide security products and services often do so to a wide and varied spectrum of industries.

Vertical Marketing Within the Security Industry Companies and institutions have a right and the expectation that security vendors will make the effort to understand the nuances of their particular industry. Several months back I was privileged to attend the ASIS International’s Program for Security Executives at the Wharton School. This program was easily one the most profound learning experiences of have ever had. Among other things this program increased our sensitivity to the points of view emanating from the C-Suites of corporations and institutions. Whether you are an in-house security manager or a security vendor of various products and services, the better you understand the C-Suite of the industry you are serving the more successful you will be. If we as security providers do not make the effort to understand the viewpoint form the other side of the desk, we will deservedly come up short.
 
You will note that a number of the members represented on this website adhere to the principal and goal of servicing vertical markets. My 30+ year business career continually teaches me of the benefits of pursuing vertical targeted markets. We have members who target the healthcare industry, security for churches, protective gear for security personnel, shopping malls and many more.

Vertical Marketing Within the Security Industry What are the benefits of pursuing vertical marketing strategies?
 
First and foremast, prospective customers appreciate that their vendors have made the effort to understand the intricacies of their particular business as opposed to vice versa. For example if your company provides video surveillance systems and you try to apply the same standards to your hospital prospects that you apply to your retail prospects, you’re in big trouble. Remember buying decisions are made on the basis of need. If you do not truly understand the real needs of your prospective customer, your chances for success are slim to none.

Take the time to learn the vertical markets you wish to pursue. Engage in conversations with industry specific security managers and ask questions and do more listening that talking. Most security directors do not appreciate being badgered at local ASIS meetings, but most do not mind responding to questions like: Tell me something about your business? How did you come to get into that industry? What are your biggest challenges?

Vertical Marketing Within the Security Industry Remember, security is a situational discipline. This means those who purvey security products and services, not only need to understand the vertical market they are calling on, but they must make the effort to understand what differentiates the business they calling on from other entities in the same general industrial category. No two shopping malls have the same needs. No two hospitals have the same security needs. No two manufacturing plants have the same set needs. In fact, given these examples, it is likely that the collective differences within a targeted vertical and greater than the collective similarities.

If you are interested in opening up new vertical markets, start out by attending industry specific trade association meetings and even consider joining some. Read industry specific trade journals. Keep your eye open of industry specific news stories. Find experts on this website and contact them for advice.

The message is clear: Jack of all trades, master of none, need not apply!

Let us hear your comments regarding vertical marketing. If you are on the receiving of security marketeers, do you favor giving time to those vendors who have taken the time and effort to understand your industry and the unique security challenges therein?

December 30, 2012

Developing Active Shooter Solutions

Developing Active Shooter SolutionsIn the wake of the Mall Shooting in Oregon followed by the school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut. There have been a plethora of experts who all say they have the solution to the problem. Everyone from the gun control lobby and people like Michael Moore, to the NRA has weighed in on the topic. The so called security experts all have a plethora of divergent solutions. Mental health experts and those who support court ordered commitment for those individuals who may be deemed not competent to live in a free society have joined the chorus.

The fact is there is no ONE solution. As I have stated in the past, "security is a situational discipline.” The efficacy of the security programs differs from school to school, from hospital to hospital and from mall to mall. The threat environments differ from one venue to the next. If the focal point of the security program moves solely to active shooter mitigation, there is the potential to do so at the expense of other security threats. Although it doesn’t grab national headlines, just look at the incidences of sexual predation in the school system across this country. Security programs must often address a variety of threats.

Effective security programs, including active shooter mitigation must result from a serious and competent assessment process. That assessment must consider and define the threat environment, as well as the effective application of contemporary physical security methodologies including effective access management, effective use of video surveillance, and importantly, human factor training of all affected parties. There also needs to be a defined partnership between the potentially affected enterprise and local law enforcement agencies. The manner by which these various strategies are implemented should be determined on a case by case basis. The affected enterprise should lean heavily on their in-house security professionals and risk management staff and/or on outside security expertise.

Mitigating decisions need driven for each affected enterprise in order to avoid falling victim to the laws of unintended consequences. Measures taken must take into consideration the environmental milieu. Such differences might include variances in law enforcement response capability, cultural considerations, and geography to name just a few. Solutions must also consider a wide range of options among physical security choices as well as the applications of CPTED options. The bottom-line is that there are no single right or wrong answers.  The only wrong answer is to do nothing.

Whether the affected enterprise is a hospital, school/university, shopping mall, hotel or and industrial site, the determinations as to effective remedies, must be determined locally. The threat environment must be locally deified and including the threat from within. Every business enterprise, as well as every educational institution, K through college, must develop an effective workplace violence prevention program before the next eruption.

Finally, if past is prologue, as security professionals, we must never stop learning. What works today, may not work tomorrow. Take the time to read retrospective studies such as the Governor’s Report on the Columbine shooting. The National Retail Federation has done good work in the area of Active Shooter mitigation. In this time, when there is so much access to information through the internet, there is not excuse to be uninformed.

Security Management Services International, Inc. has the ability, through our onsite security assessment services, to find practical mitigation strategies for a wide range of risks. The goal is to develop security programs that reasonably reduce risk to an acceptable level.  This means taking into consideration both the internal and external threat environment. It also means that one size does not fit all.
October 18, 2012

Security Management Support Program

If you believe your organization needs a qualified Security Manager, but your budget cannot support another salary, consider this alternative. Security Management Services International, Inc. (SMSI Inc.) is offering security management support services as an exclusive and unique service primarily to those clients who have availed themselves of a SMSI Inc. Security Assessment. SMSI fully understands that many enterprises cannot cost justify the hiring of a fulltime, qualified, security manager. Nevertheless this fact does not mean that most business enterprises do not need the expertise of a qualified security manager. Most enterprises need security expertise throughout the course of the year, but albeit, not on a daily bases. The validity assumption is supported by our extensive security litigation experience. The potential for liability claims against an organization that does not have security management expertise managing their security programs is greater than those organizations that maintain full time security management presence.

Alternatively, we will also offer this service to clients who have not contracted for a SMSI Security Review and Assessment. For those clients who wish to participate in our Security Management Support Program (SMSP) for at least one year, Security Management Services International, Inc. will perform an initial assessment at a 20% discounted fee.

Effective security programs must have two pervasive missions: the protection of property and the protection of people. The degree that any enterprise has a responsibility to protect property or people from a liability perspective varies from one industry to another. For example, those companies that provide third party warehousing in support of supply chain operations, bare responsibility when product go missing. The same logic applies to freight companies such as rail and trucking operations Businesses the serve the public such as shopping malls, parking structures, hospitals, daycare centers, hotels and schools (public & private) are all expected to maintain dynamic security operations.

Anecdotally, the odds of being sued for an inadequate security program are much higher for schools and those business enterprises such as hospitals, malls and high-rise buildings when there is an absence of in-house security management. However it is understandable that many business enterprises cannot justify the $100k to $200K+ salary that a well-qualified in-house security manger would demand. Our SMSP offers an effective alternative. The SMSI Inc. Security Management Support Program will protect your interests when dealing with those who provide security products and service such as contract security services. Additionally, our SMSP will continually monitor those security vendors by ensuring they live up to their commitments.

Many enterprises may not need a security manager on a daily basis, but a security professional will be needed several times throughout the year. Remember security is a situational discipline, meaning one size does not fit all. Additionally, security is a proactive discipline aimed at deterrence and prevention. This means that security programs are not amenable to universal solutions. Security programs must be promulgated on the basis of need, and that need may not be static. This means that security programs must be nimble by constantly adjusting to emerging changes in the threat environment. It is especially important that security programs achieve a reasonable standard of care for environments such as schools and healthcare facilities because of vulnerability exposure of the clients being served, patients and children. Adverse security events in schools and medical facilities are likely to be played on the six o’clock news nationwide.

SMSI, through its Security Management Support Program (SMSP) program is able to fill this void. This program will be customized to meet the needs of each client we serve. In many cases, a comprehensive security assessment may be required prior to the provision of Security Management Support services. If a security assessment is deemed advisable, SMSI Inc. will perform these services at a preferred rate for those clients who commit to a SMSP Contract.

If your organization presently has and in-house security manager who is light on experience, the SMSP will support that manager until such time he/she can function independently.

Security Management Support Services may include, but are not limited to:

  • Security vendor selection & oversight
  • Security design and project management
  • Security Incident tracking and trend analysis (Remote monitoring & analysis)
  • Professional guidance in the selection and application of security systems
    • Access management systems
    • Video surveillance systems
    • Lighting
    • The application of CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)
      • Lighting
      • Natural barrier usage
      • Signage
      • Landscape application
      • Housekeeping & Maintenance
      • Graffiti eradication programs
  • Visitor control
  • Management of Aggressive Behavior (MOAB®) training.
  • Hiring and background checking protocols
  • Asset protection programs
    • Inventory control audits
  • Student, patient, guest & employee safety programs
  • Crimecast data & reports
    • UCR Reports
  • Staff crime prevention strategies
  • Police liaison services
    • Community relations/crime prevention officer involvement
  • Employment Bullying Mitigation
  • Sexual deviancy awareness
  • Overnight Building security
    • Alarm system design and supervision
    • Security lighting
    • Locking systems
    • Surveillance system
  • Neighborhood Watch
  • Gang sensitivity awareness
    • Graffiti awareness
  • Workplace Drug detection and prevention
  • Staff security awareness training
  • Year round security awareness program
  • In-persons visits to be determined on a need basis by SMSI security professionals
  • Unrestricted Remote Management Support
    • Problem solving
    • Crisis management support
  • Neighborhood outreach
Terms & Conditions
  1. Four visits per year included in annual contract (Extra visits on per diem basis)
  2. Reimbursement for reasonable and documented expenses
  3. Unlimited remote support
  4. Minimum of one year contract
    1. Initial retainer
    2. Monthly billing of balance
    3. Flat rate billing for visits in excess of four

All SMSI Inc. personnel will be Board Certified Protection Professionals and/or will be former law enforcement veterans. These professionals may also be Spanish bilingual. Remember, the cost of reaction is always three to four times the cost of mitigation.

For information, contact Bill Nesbitt, CPP: bill@smsiinc.com or call 805-499-3800.

June 7, 2012

Need For Stab Vests Identified Following Assault On Prison Officer

Prison officers in New Zealand are appalled with their Corrections Department for saying stab vests are available after another prison officer was attacked at Rimutaka Prison last week.Stab Vests  

More than fifty prison officers have now contacted the Corrections Association in New Zealand, demanding stab vests or some sort of body armour, understanding that prisoners are volatile and unpredictable.

"I strongly believe we must understand better, and remind ourselves that we cannot change the aggressive behaviour of some prisoners” Robert Kaiser, CEO of UK based PPSS Group comments.

"There is simply no doubt that a prisoner consuming drugs, illegal substances or self made alcohol can become hostile and violent within a split of a second, regardless of the prison officers excellent communication skill and calm personality”.

"The ideas to create make shift weapons, e.g. sharpened table and bed frame legs, shanks made out of plastic, sharpened wood or pieces of mirror, and the idea of melting razor blades into tooth brushes and turning pens and pencils into weapon have not been developed out of 5 minutes of simple boredom.  These ideas have been developed following hours and hours of malicious thought processes, and even the very best prison officer can one day be on the receiving end of such thought process”.

A recent publication of the American Correctional Officer once claimed that 33.5% of all assaults in prisons and jails are committed by inmates against prison officers.

According to official statistics obtained by the Howard League for Penal Reform show that recorded assault incidents in prison in England and Wales have risen by 61 per cent between 2000 and 2009.

Based on this statistic prison officers at Hindley Young Offenders Institution, the largest child prison in Europe, are particularly affected with assaults on staff up by an astonishing 967 per cent.

We all will remember too well the outrageous attack on prison officers at the Frankland High Security Prison in March 2010, almost costing the lives of two prison officers, and have to accept the fact this is not a country specific problem, but rather a serious occupational hazard across all countries.

Robert Kaiser states: "The fact is that prison officers deal with some of the most dangerous, violent and unpredictable people in our society on a daily basis, and this is why I suggest they have the simple right to demand appropriate protection and the undivided attention and support from those charged with ensuring their welfare and personal safety”.

It is a rather interesting fact that a police officer who deals with dangerous criminal individuals for only a very few minutes every day is by law required to wear protective equipment… but the prison officer charged with supervising the same individual, potentially for a number of years, is not being issued with any type of protective clothing at all.

Robert Kaiser has been part of numerous discussions and consultancy meetings with prison and correctional facilities in several countries and fully understands all concerns: ”In every single of these meetings the ‘non-confrontational design’ question has always been the centre point of these sometimes very passionate discussions”.

"However, I always seem to come back to the same point, explaining that design and manufacturing capabilities have evolved so much over the past years. Concealable, thin and lightweight blunt trauma stab vests, extremely well suited for prison officers, are now available”.

It is without question, that covert stab vests and similar type of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) will reduce the risk of workplace violence related injuries, and should this fact not be at least be worth starting an open minded discussion on the personal safety of prison officers?

---

PPSS Group is a UK based manufacturer of certified covert bullet proof vests, stab proof vests and the company behind Cut-Tex® PRO.  This groundbreaking fabric is one of the world's strongest cut resistant fabrics and is now being used to manufacture cut resistant clothing for police, military, prisons and private security firms all over the world.

Robert Kaiser, CEO of PPSS Group is globally respected expert in body armour and known for his passion for personal protection and personal safety.  He is frequently invited to speak in front of large audiences about the latest body armour developments within homeland security and domestic frontline services.  He is acting as body armour consultant for a number of organisations, associations, unions and government departments.
May 30, 2012

The Evolution of the Security Assessment

I recently took the occasion to peruse some security assessments we did some 25 years ago for a number of varied and diverse clients. I was struck how far we have come, in so many ways, over that passage of time. I thought it might be useful to focus on four factors that have had a profound impact on how we all do our job, assessing the efficacy of our security programs today as compared to 25 years ago.

First, no matter what segment of the security industry you are in, the 9/11/01 attack on the World Trade center in New York in the wake of the attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building by Timothy McVeigh, April 19th, 1995 has impacted every aspect of the of our industry worldwide. It has redefined physical security, established new reasonable standards of care and spawned and further legitimized emerging disciplines such as CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design). These events have sharpened the anticipatory aspects of our professional focus. Proactive mitigation is now more critical than ever.  We can no longer afford to wait for a breach to happen and then act.

Second, but not unrelated to the first, is the exponential advancement of technology. Technological advances are moving with wrap speed and those security professionals who do not keep pace will lose their professional edge. Just look at the changes in the use of video and systems integration. Concepts such as "virtual patrol” were nonexistent just a few years ago. The application of computer technology and electronic system has made security systems more responsive, and much more cost effective. In many cases, it has reduced the level of the manpower requirement, while at the same time making remaining security personnel much more effective.

Third, security professionals are now required to become intimately conversant with the views, values and goals of those who occupy the C-Suite. They must understand the persona of the corporations they serve (both for profit & not for profit). Their decisions and recommendations must be driven by ROI and should endeavor to have a five year shelf life. In many cases, security managers need much more business acumen today than was required 25 years ago. The ASIS International Security Management course in conjunction with the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania is one program that enables security managers to meet these kinds of objectives, and a program I wholeheartedly recommend.

Fourth, but not least, is the rise of security derived litigation, mostly in the United States. Security lawsuits are filed against businesses for what they do and for what they don’t do. When suits are filed for intentional torts, they may include assertion of false arrest, excessive use of force, false imprisonment and/or invasion of privacy. When businesses are sued for an omission, they often include the assertion of inadequate security. The majority of both of these categories of litigation, more likely than not, affect enterprises that affords public access (Hospitals, Shopping Malls, Apartment Complexes, HOAs, the Lodging Industry, Entertainment Venues, etc.). Although most of the aforementioned examples are largely personal injury cases, we are seeing number of similar lawsuits resulting from property losses against trucking companies, supply chain facilities, etc. More and more, security managers are finding they need to be conversant with litigation trends within their respective industries, and within their respective geographies.

The challenge is to stay current. We can never stop learning. When must never rest on past laurels. We must continually seek divergent sources of information. It is incumbent on each of us to determine the legitimacy of the information we acquire. Finally, we must continue to talk with one another.

William H. Nesbitt, CPP
President
Security Management Services International, Inc.
December 20, 2011

The Role of Security Consultants

The Role of Security Consultants

There are a number of security consultants listed on this Website. Most of the security consultants that are members of Security Source Online are competent, well experienced and maintain a high degree of integrity. They bring a wide range of expertise to the clients they serve whether on the factory floor, a hospital, shopping center or in the courtroom.

The value of Security Consultants is that they are able to bring an objective point of view to the clients they serve. In order for them to bring objectivity to the table, security consultants should be independent professionals without ties to the vendor side of the industry. For those of you outside the security consulting world, you may be surprised to know there is a good deal of friendship and mutual respect among these professionals. You will find that most have several years of multifaceted experience prior to hanging out their shingle. Most security consultants hold the CPP designation, along with other certifications.

What benefits are derived through the use of Security Consultants?

As mentioned, the first benefit is objectivity. Many of the organizations we work with have experienced security professionals running their security programs, yet they avail themselves. One may question why an experienced security manager would go outside and hire a consultant. In almost all cases, the reason given is they are seeking a fresh objective perspective. Because experienced security consultants have worked for a variety of diverse clientele, they have a wide range of experience to call upon. They understand many vertical industries and they understand the need to ensure that each security programs is responsive to the situational environment at hand. This objectivity is also useful in helping clients choosing security vendors. Not all vendors are created equally and some vendors who may be strong in Peoria may not be so strong in Sacramento.

Because of their breadth of experience, security consultants have a good understanding what works and what doesn’t work. Their perspective is also buttressed by the fact they frequently communicate with one-another. This knowledge helps ensure to that scarce resources produce will optimal ROI for the clients they serve. They understand that most security programs most meet the corporate goal of management. Security consultants understand the need to ensure that each security program fits within the framework of the organization as determined by the C-Suite.

Finally, our role as security consultants is a positive one. The best security consultants do not come into an organization with the preconceived notion to find fault and with the intent to rebuild the security program in their own image. Rather our role is to come into an organization to discover what is right and what is working, and then determine how to make it better. This concept is generally referred to as positive consulting as opposed to coming to a project with the predisposition to find fault.

As we said at the onset, there are numerous security consultants here at Security Source Online. Most security consultants are driven, to one degree or another, by a certain sense of altruism. If you doubt this, contact some of the consultants on this website. You will find them forthcoming and willing to have a discussion on a wide range of concerns you may have. You will also find that of you raise an issue outside the realm of their expertise; they will refer you to one or more of their colleagues.

Security consultants provide comprehensive security assessment, provide security management support, develop security system RFPs, provide security designs as well as project management support. Many security consultants are active in the forensic area as court qualified expert witnesses.

I hope this topic evokes some discussion form our members and other interested parties. I hope we can elicit differing points of views from other consultants and well as the pros and cons from those who have used security consultants. All security professionals strive for excellence and forums like this advance that cause.
July 18, 2011

Providing Appropriate Body Armor or Stab Vests To Security Professionals Is A Sign Of Respect

by Robert Kaiser

Providing Appropriate Body Armor or Stab Vests To Security Professionals Is A Sign Of Respect"Of course” you might say, "we would not expect to hear anything else from someone who runs a company that is specialized in the development of body armor… does it not make a lot of commercial sense to him?”

But why don’t you just ignore this fact for a couple of minutes while you are reading my blog.  Just for once, accept the fact that some professionals actually genuinely care, have other people safety in mind and simply want to redirect people focus on security and safety related issues that really matters.

Over a number of years I have been operationally involved in the security industry, here in the UK and a number of other countries prior to that.  I retired just a few years ago in order to set up PPSS Group.  During these years I was unfortunate enough to witness fellow security professionals loosing their lives and others suffering from horrendous and long lasting injuries.  In fact it often was my responsibility to make that so very emotional and personal call to their next of kin, explaining why their loved one will not come home or requires long term care.

The interesting thing I have noticed is that not many security professionals complained or moaned after a violent incident.  They really seem to believe it is a part of their job and they have to get on with that.  You know what?  It actually is their job.  The moment you decide to become a security professional, police officer or prison officer you can not expect to be treated respectfully every time you go to work.  You cannot expect to stay unharmed every time you face potentially hostile and violent members of the public.  You cannot expect to be handled gently by intoxicated aggressors when a situation has escalated and turned into something of a disaster.

BUT… and this is a massive BUT… there are things a security professional must be able to expect, and that is the respect of their employer, their genuine care and their willingness to do everything in their power to enable him to do his job as safely as possible.

Managing Directors, Operations Director or Operations Managers either care about human beings, and above all of them the professionals who represent their interest or they do not.  It really is that simple.
Providing Appropriate Body Armor or Stab Vests To Security Professionals Is A Sign Of Respect 
Just over the past few months we had to read news, which included phrases such as "a security guard was hit with an iron bar during an armed robbery”, "a gang of robbers attacked a security guard front of terrified shoppers”,  "security guard assaulted during Walton robbery” and "a doorman needed surgery”.  We cannot look away any longer.  We have to accept responsibility, ensure their personal safety and at least look into the issue of body armour or stab vests as a real option.

How should we proceed?  Should we do as little as possible in reference to the personal safety of security professionals? Should we just do enough so we get away with things?  Or, should we go beyond what is expected and exceed our employee’s expectations and legal requirements?

Forget The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 and other countries equivalent laws, forget the legal consequences of directors not complying with basic health and safety regulations, but let us not forget RESPECT. We all complain and comment about the lack of respect in this and many other countries, but when it comes to respect, should we not start with the people close to us, those who work for us?

Some of the most successful business people, such as Sir Richard Branson, have long emphasized the importance of looking after your employees and making them feel respected and appreciated.

Asking security professionals to operate without body armor, stab vests or other type of personal protection, increases their risk of workplace violence related injuries, it increases their risk of getting injured, and in my professional opinion it is in breach of health and safety regulations, but above all it is NOT an expression of respect.

Providing Appropriate Body Armor or Stab Vests To Security Professionals Is A Sign Of RespectIf we genuinely care we must make sure these guys are as safe as they can be. It is a bit like a seat belt in your car.  You might well be happy not to wear a seat belt, and you know what?  This is your decision, it is your problem and it is your risk you are willing to take. To make such a decision over your employees head, to refuse issuing them with body armor or stab vests or forcing them to work with a ‘if you do not like it do not work for me’ attitude is wrong… and one of the very simple reasons why society is the way it is.  For me, regardless of any commercial interest I might be accused of here, it shows a clear lack of respect!

Should you have any questions, then feel free to contact PPSS Group directly on +44 (0) 845 5193 95 email info@ppss-group.com or visit www.ppss-group.com.



PPSS Group is a UK based manufacturer of certified bullet proof vests, stab vests and the company behind Cut-Tex® PRO.  This groundbreaking fabric is the world’s strongest cut resistant fabric and is now used to manufacture slash resistant clothing for police, military, emergency services, prisons and private security professionals all over the world.

Robert Kaiser, CEO of PPSS Group is widely respected expert in body armour and known for his passion for protection and personal safety.  He is frequently invited to speak in front of large audiences about the latest body armour developments within homeland security and domestic frontline services.  He is acting as body armour consultant for a number of organisations, associations, unions and government departments.
June 28, 2011

On the Importance of Establishing a Working Project Budget

Establishing a Working Project BudgetRecently, I have had several opportunities to gain business from potential customers that I was not able to close before. Their projects were shelved due to unforeseen budget demands and priority shifts away from security. Sometimes your efforts will appear to go nowhere.

All efforts leads to something though, right? even if you don’t get that job opportunity the first time, you will learn something at least. I should hope so. Business isn’t always about knowing exactly what to do every time. Much of the time, it is about learning what NOT to do. Avoiding huge pitfalls will allow for steady learning and growth. In those efforts that appear worthless, we should be viewing the opportunity to gain knowledge. What sort of knowledge can we learn in the physical security business? Plenty. Lets go over a few examples.

Communication. I have written about this before. The importance of good communication with your potential customer cannot be over-rated. There are plenty of pitfalls to avoid and you can learn many of these by really talking and just as importantly, listening to your customer. One of the big things you should try to establish early on is the customers budgetary range.

It is common for small business customers and non-chain customers to react in two ways. One way is to feel like you will try to soak up that budget by charging the most and providing the cheapest possible equipment and service. The other way is to give a knee-jerk reaction number that is somewhat lower than what they are really willing to pay. Both of these reactions can occur within minutes of each other and either one can deal a hard blow to your sale.

Why? Why would they do that?

Two main reasons come to mind…one- it’s their nature, and two- they don’t trust you enough to give you the truth. The first scenario is a tough one to get past but it is far less common than the second. The second scenario is actually an indicator for you. This is a flag that says loud and clear,” You haven’t spent enough time getting to know me, the customer.”

It is important to recognize this scenario so you can correct for it on that visit and prevent it in future visits. Without a good level of trust, you might never learn the true nature of their project budget. You should take care to introduce your company and yourself in a fashion that lets the customer be at ease. They should see you as a partner in solving their problems, not just another security vendor. Try to get on a familiar ground with the customer without being that dreaded, disliked "sales guy”. After all, you are hoping for repeat business aren’t you… or haven’t you been reading my articles?

OK. On to that budget. Your expenses start on your drive over to the customer site. You need to included all of your efforts in the cost of doing business or your ROI numbers will always be incorrect. I mention this because nobody wants to throw good investment efforts at a dry well. There is such a thing as a bad job. This type of job is the killer of small businesses. It is the type of job taken out of desperation or implied promise of bona-fide paying work in the future. It can typically show up in the form of a simple job, but as the job progresses, the job scope changes and not in the ways that pay but in the ways that don’t. Extra labor for out-of-scope wiring requests or forgotten equipment or job results that are unsatisfactory to the customer. Communication is the name of this game. The budget is the tool that keeps all the ducks in a row. It keeps you from expanding the job too much, and it allows you to make accurate hardware and labor goals for an expected, stated, outcome.

Nobody wants to arrive at a customer site and go through the entire site survey. Learning, observing, talking about capabilities and solutions for an hour or more; then come up with an estimate that might take 1-3 hours to create in software and logistics; only to have the customer get sticker shock and say "Twenty two thousand? I was thinking more like five grand!”

Now you’re really in a jam. They think you might be out to milk them, and you are already 2-4 hours in the hole with your visit and estimate etc. Now you have to decide if they will even entertain a lesser number from you and whats worse, you have an even smaller profit portion from which to recoup your existing time investment.

It could all have been avoided in the beginning. Establish a good rapport with the customer. Get them to understand that you want to help them. Inquire about their budget early. If they balk at the request, let them know that you need a money limit to stay under or you will likely just waste their time, and you don’t want that. If they are an inexperienced buyer, you may need to coax them along. It’s OK to do that. Remember that you are providing a genuine service here, and part of that service is education. Let them know that this is standard procedure for this type of B2B interaction. Some people are uncomfortable with talking about larger amounts of money. No problem. We all start someplace. Take the opportunity to make them feel at ease, and then move in again and get that number. You need it.

The larger or more experienced customers understand all this. They realize it is just part of the language or dance or whatever term you want to use to denote the early portion of an estimate scenario.

Budgets come and budgets go. One minute you are happy to spend 6 hours creating the perfect system installation, and then you hear that bad news…”Our snow removal budget was completely used up and we have to use the security budget for something else now, so…maybe next year.” It happens. But, if you have played it right, they call you up in the spring and say "Hey, we have our new budget and we are ready to go. Can you give us an updated version of the estimate?”

That’s how you know you have done it right! They call you and tell you stuff just like that.

At InSightCCTV, we work smartly to make sure our customers get the best possible outcome. Thank you for reading!

Dave Johansen of InSightCCTV www.insightcctv.com
June 24, 2011

Slash Resistant Duty Jacket To Protect Security Professionals

"PPSS have now launched a highly slash resistant Duty Jacket in order to help protect our security professional” Robert Kaiser, their CEO states.                                                                             

Slash Resistant Duty Jacket"Security professionals who deal with potentially hostile members of the public certainly require additional protection from edged weapons”.

This new slash resistant duty jacket offers BS EN 388:2003 Blade Cut Resistance Level 5 – the highest possible, by using Cut-Tex® PRO.

Cut-Tex® PRO is one of the world’s strongest cut resistant fabrics.

Featuring two large front pockets plus a good size chest pocket this new duty jacket offers plenty of storage space.

Highly durable Nylon rip stop fabric, used as outer material, ensures this great new protective garment can cope with most difficult tasks our security professional face on a day to day basis.

"My favourite feature is a type of long slit we have added right next to the two large size pockets, which allow easy direct access to the duty belt or firearm for Close Protection Officers overseas,” says Robert Kaiser.

PPSS slash resistant Duty Jackets are water and wind resistant and extremely robust.

This new model is available in black as standard colour and in a number of sizes, ranging from XS to XXXL.

Should you have any questions in reference to high visibility stab vests, then feel free to contact PPSS Group directly on +44 (0) 845 5193 95 email info@ppss-group.com or visit www.ppss-group.com.



PPSS Group is a UK based manufacturer of certified bullet proof vests, stab vests and the company behind Cut-Tex® PRO.  This groundbreaking fabric is the world’s strongest cut resistant fabric and is now used to manufacture slash resistant clothing for police, military, emergency services, prisons and private security professionals all over the world.

Robert Kaiser, CEO of PPSS Group is widely respected expert in body armour and known for his passion for protection and personal safety.  He is frequently invited to speak in front of large audiences about the latest body armour developments within homeland security and domestic frontline services.  He is acting as body armour consultant for a number of organisations, associations, unions and government departments.
June 17, 2011

UK based PPSS launch high visibility stab vests series

"PPSS have now launched a series of high visibility stab vests, clearly demonstrating that body armour do not have to look confrontational, aggressive or authoritative ” Robert Kaiser, their CEO states.
                                                                          
High Visibility Stab Vests"Frontline employees dealing with the public should be doing their utmost to express themselves as peaceful ambassadors within their line of work, and our high visibility stab vests allow them do express themselves peacefully and appear approachable” Robert continues.

Professionals dealing with potentially hostile members of the public should be able to use their positive personality, diplomacy and negotiation skills to defuse a situation, and certain types of overt body armour can certainly send the wrong signal and make professionals appear like ‘Rambo’ or ‘Robocop’.

Covert body armour or stab vests on the other hand can at times be very impractical as not all security professionals are required to wear body armour all the time whilst on duty.

Many security professionals simply prefer the idea of over body armour as they can easily be taken off when driving or reporting back in the office.  They appreciate the occasional opportunity to unzip the body armour and let the body breath for a few minutes especially during the hot summer months.

But as just stated, the problem with some over body armour however is that they can of course look quite aggressive, hence many security and health and safety managers have been looking for ‘peaceful’ or none-aggressive looking overt body armour.

"Perception is without a doubt one of the most important factors within personal safety and personal protective equipment.  This is why we believe our new high visibility stab vests series offers a great solution” Robert says.

PPSS high visibility stab vests offer UK Home Office certified KR1 stab protection and confirm with the European EN 471:2003 high visibility standard.

They are available in ‘body armour’, ‘jacket’ and ‘vest’ styles and come in a number of sizes, ranging from XS to XXXL.

Bespoke sizes are also available upon special request.

Should you have any questions in reference to high visibility stab vests, then feel free to contact PPSS Group directly on +44 (0) 845 5193 95 email info@ppss-group.com or visit www.ppss-group.com .



PPSS Group is a UK based manufacturer of certified bullet proof vests, stab vests and the company behind Cut-Tex® PRO.  This groundbreaking fabric is the world’s strongest cut resistant fabric and is now used to manufacture slash resistant clothing for police, military, emergency services, prisons and private security professionals all over the world.

Robert Kaiser, CEO of PPSS Group is widely respected expert in body armour and known for his passion for protection and personal safety.  He is frequently invited to speak in front of large audiences about the latest body armour developments within homeland security and domestic frontline services.  He is acting as body armour consultant for a number of organisations, associations, unions and government departments.
May 3, 2011

Making the Decision to Manage Risk , by Jim McGuffey, CPP

Making the Decision to Manage Risk
By
Jim McGuffey, CPP

Church Risk Management

This article while intended for Houses of Worship can be applied to any organization.

I recently went for a walk when I observed clouds moving in and then about half way through my walk I felt a few drops. This was all the warning I needed to start heading home which I did thus escaping the down pour that soon followed.

My decision to avoid the rain and subsequent soaking is akin to avoiding risk. There have been other times however that while walking, I experienced no warning. The sky was blue and then all of a sudden out of nowhere I was in the middle of a down pour.
 
You might ask, why would I compare risk warnings to warnings regarding rain? In many cases, warnings regarding risk in our personal or business lives are often right before our eyes and as obvious as clouds in the sky and the rain drops that are precursor to a downpour.
 
During my business career our team made it a practice to make productivity/profit equal to safety and security. We tried to prevent bad things from happening. However, sometimes no matter how much our team planned and tried to avoid a threat, bad things would happen but the vast majority of times threats and risk were avoided, reduced or mitigated due to our planning and implementation of appropriate security measures.
 
Some church leaders take the view that bad things are going to happen to people no matter how much one tries to avoid these things. Many times nothing does occur but in my opinion without planning we ride on luck. Many leaders prepare for as much as possible and even after all their planning something horrible occurs. So the question becomes, why should we prepare to manage risk?
 
There are many reasons to make the decision to improve safety at your church.  As a leader of your church, please consider the value that improving safety has for your church members and keep in mind that this decision need not be costly or burdensome. Plan for the best and prepare for the worst. If as a leader you take this approach and something bad does occur you will have a much better chance of recovering and moving forward in a much quicker fashion.

While major loss events serve to demoralize organizations, I witnessed the opposite when my business encountered three horrific events to include the death of fellow associates. Following these tragedies, team members came together to support each other and management knowing that our team had taken necessary precautions to avoid and recover from loss events.  The recovery plan is crucial when disaster strikes. I cannot stress this enough although it often falls on deaf ears because many are willing to roll the dice.
 
During my walk where I made the decision to escape the rain, I thought about the decision process that church leaders must experience when debating if any effort should be made to improve safety and security at their House of Worship. Many church leaders believe that they will experience less risk than other businesses since God is their protector.  Taking steps to improve safety and security may be construed by some church members or even more importantly by God as a lack of trust in God to provide protection.

Although I firmly believe that God does protect his flock, I am also firmly convinced that God wants us to do the best that we can to avoid harm. In most cases God provides us with warning signs to avoid threats, much like the weather example I mentioned. You see the clouds, you feel a few drops and you know that a down pour or storm is imminent.
 
Identifying and assessing threats and hazards is sort of like anticipating a rain or storm. Quite often there are signs that a threat or hazard is going to occur. As it relates to threats, I receive numerous Google Alerts daily regarding specific types of crimes that occur at churches, retail stores, hotels, and many other businesses. In many cases there were indicators that a threat was imminent and could have been anticipated and security strategies could have been enacted that may have mitigated the consequence and helped recover from the impact.
I am not a proponent of using the SHOCK FACTOR to improve security. I deliberately refrain from posting too many horrific incidents on my websites to avoid the shock factor. I prefer posting vandalism, embezzlement and other security incidents simply to increase awareness. I would use the shock effect if I thought it worked but over the years, I have learned that the best way to improve security and safety is through increased employee awareness and education programs that encourage willing participation.

In most cases informed people act responsibly. I for one love life and although when my time is up there will be nothing I can do about it, I try to do things (within reason) that will help me to live as long as possible.  I encourage church leaders to take reasonable steps to improve safety and security. There are tried, tested and proven security practices that will cost your church very little to implement and will have a significant positive return on an investment to deter, mitigate and recover from consequences that could occur from threats and hazards.
 
Recently a reporter told me that he had not thought about crime occurring in churches. Within a few days of that comment, I received a random Google Alert of an embarrassing crime occurring in the same small town that the reporter resided. I do not Google alerts by town so I was surprised as was this reporter to receive this notification since there are thousands of small towns in our large country.

I don’t believe in using the shock factor to improve security and I don’t think that most churches require a CCTV system. I do however think that most churches could benefit from a burglar and fire alarm system. I am a huge supporter of processes and procedures rather than systems as security strategies to deter, delay, detect, respond to and recover from threats and hazards. This is not to say that an integrated security system is not needed and if following a security risk analysis, this security strategy is selected, then I support it whole heartedly! But the key is to conduct a security risk analysis first prior to allocating funds towards any system or prior to changing any established security process or before starting a security program. Please review my Security Risk Analysis article posted on this site www.churchsecurityconsultant.com
 
About the Author:
 
Jim has 40 years of security management experience and he is board certified in Security Management with a B.A. in Criminal Justice and M.A. in Management. Jim has been a member of A.S.I.S. International since 1981 and he is also a member if the International Association of Professional Security Consultants (IAPSC). Please contact Jim McGuffey, CPP at 215-460-7370 or jimmcguffey@verizon.net for questions regarding this article. Jim provides several pro bono security risk assessments each year for several Houses of Worship. He is seeking security articles related to churches from other security professionals for posting on www.churchsecurityconsultant.com
 
Disclaimer:  The articles contained on this website are written for general information purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be used as, a primary source for making security decisions. The owner of this website may not agree with all of the content contained within the enclosed articles and it is the responsibility of the end users and viewers to evaluate and seek out additional guidance as deemed appropriate for application by local leadership.
May 2, 2011

Security Management Alternatives

Security Management AlternativesThere is an evolving trend toward a middle ground between having no Security Manager and employing a fulltime Security Manager/Director. Every business or organization either cannot justify a fulltime security management position or they believe they cannot afford the cost of employing a fully qualified Security Manager. Some companies that use contract security services will pay extra for and onsite security supervisor as part of the total package being provided by the contracting guard company. To the extent this site manager is qualified to take on the role beyond that of supervising contract security officers is questionable and may present a conflict of interest. Yet, in the real world, when one inquiries "who is in charge of security?” the onsite supervisor is often named.
 
Stepping into this void is a number of fully qualified and certified security professionals who assume the role of Security Management Support. These professionals operate under contract to oversee and monitor all aspects of the security operations including oversight of guard force operations, physical security vendors and investigative services. They often write and oversee a wide range of RFPs and participate in the vendor selection process. The expertise provided by these professionals is at least equal to that of a fulltime security manager minus the expense of payroll, taxes and fringe benefits. Every enterprise does not require a fulltime security manager, but most enterprises require some security management expertise.
 
What is your opinion on this matter? Does this approach have merit? What are the pitfalls? What are the advantages? Are you familiar with this alternative approach?
April 29, 2011

Survey Confirms Paramedics Require User Friendly Body Armour

High Vizability Body Armour"Too many paramedics and other frontline professionals are still opposed to wearing stab vests or other forms of body protection, due to simple misperception", says Robert Kaiser, CEO of UK based PPSS Group.

Many internal surveys, conducted by the UK's Ambulance Trusts concluded that stab vests are not wanted by their frontline staff.

Paramedics Body ArmourRobert Kaiser strongly believes this is simply due to 'technical and design misperceptions' of body armour.

"We have conducted a six months survey, questioning a number of paramedics within the UK how they feel about stab vests, and the result is absolutely clear".

"Of course, there will be people doubting the efficiency of our survey. Nevertheless, we strongly believe this survey shows once again, professionals require user friendly protection".

Based on the PPSS survey, 72.8% of those completing the survey stated "stab vests, which offer blunt trauma protection, should be issued to ALL Paramedics".

87.7% also confirmed that "paramedics should be issued with their OWN INDIVIDUAL stab vest".

55.6% mentioned they were not aware of the latest available advances in covert stab vests, e.g. thickness, weight, concealability and wearability.

"Many of these professionals still believe stab vests are 6kg heavy, one inch thick, bulky, uncomfortable, restrictive and confrontational looking. But this is now far away from the truth".

Mr Kaiser is convinced that the majority of violent attacks on emergency services staff in the UK are not edged weapon, knife or needle related. He believes that the majority of assaults are 'blunt trauma related incidents'.

"Based on many years of frontline experience and our extensive research we know that the risk of knife or needle attacks exist, but this risk is nowhere near as high as the risk of being pushed, punched or kicked whilst on duty".

"This is why we have developed concealable, ultra thin and 2.1kg light body armour that protects the wearer from any type of knife and needle, but more importantly also from punches, kicks and any type of blows".

Mr Kaiser explains: "I think it is time to ask paramedics, prison officers and other emergency services personnel the right questions and educate them in a caring and supportive manner."

"Let us show them how much body armour have advanced. We fully understand the operational responsibilities and risks of ambulance personnel and our body armour reflect this understanding".

On Thursday 10th April, PPSS Group delivered a very informative public presentation, demonstrating the astonishing capabilities of their recently developed body armour, stab vests and slash resistant clothing at the London Islington Hilton Hotel. The event was attended by numerous organisations and professionals.

Aiming to clarify the common misperceptions of body armour, Mr Kaiser himself demonstrated the effectiveness and capabilities of the equipment. The two LIVE demonstrations, which saw the audience gasping for air, certainly had a huge impact and impressed all visitors.

Mr Kaiser strongly recommends to all NHS Ambulance Trusts, Healthcare Trusts and any organisations which employ frontline professionals to re-look at the potential requirements for user friendly and lightweight body armour..

Should you have any questions in reference to body armour, stab vests or slash resistant clothing, then please feel free to contact PPSS Group on +44 (0) 845 5193 95 email info@ppss-group.com or visit www.ppss-group.com



PPSS Group is a UK based manufacturer of UK Home Office certified stab vests and the company behind Cut-Tex® PRO. This groundbreaking fabric is the world's strongest cut resistant fabric and is now used to manufacture slash resistant clothing for police, military, emergency services, prisons and private security professionals all over the world.

Robert Kaiser, CEO of PPSS Group is frequently invited to speak in front of large audiences about the latest body armour developments within homeland security and domestic frontline services. He is acting as body armour consultant for a number of organisations, associations and government departments. He is also organiser of the annual LONE WORKER SAFETY Conference & Exhibition, taking place in London in May every year.
April 16, 2011

Detecting Deception During the Employment Interview

 Detecting Deception During the Interview Process

Studies by independent organizations found that 49% of applicants falsify applications and lie during the interview process and approximately 40% of employees steal from their employers. A recognized method to reduce theft is to hire an honest employee. During the hiring process, companies have historically focused on skills, capabilities and personality, leaving honesty to be determined by background checks and drug testing.

Jim McGuffey, CPP and Owner of A.C.E. Security Consultants has interviewed hundreds of applicants for both management and hourly positions. During the interview process Jim obtained serious admissions such as work place theft, significant vehicle accidents, workplace violence, and illegal drug use during work hours and other critical admissions. These admissions were made after applicants had been interviewed and declared candidates for employment by a supervisor, pending background checks and drug testing. Fortunately the author took a few minutes to interview these applicants prior to extending a conditional offer of employment.

Background checks and drug testing are lacking for the following reasons: past employers seldom release negative information for fear of legal action; illegal drugs may go undetected if the candidate stops using drugs, depending upon the type of test run, cocaine may disappear within the system in 48 hours; and criminal checks may not capture all illegal activity.

Jim emphasizes that interviewers must stop taking notes while applicants are responding to their questions in order to observe verbal and non-verbal behavior that may be indicative of deception following response to key questions. He also emphasizes the importance making a decision based upon the entire interview process as there is no single action or lack of action that is indicative of deception. It is possible that a truthful subject may respond in a manner indicative of deception and a deceptive person may appear to be truthful.

There are many myths regarding verbal and non verbal behavior. One of the many misconceptions is that if someone does not look you in the eye when asking or responding to a question, they are lying. Although this action may be indicative of deception depending on the timing which must be compared to a baseline, many liars are aware of this perception and make it a practiced point of looking you in the eye.

The interviewer must learn the importance of listening and observing behavior and refrain from forming an opinion until after all behavior has been evaluated. Detecting deception is not easy but you can improve your chances of success provided you understand the importance of observing and listening and not jumping to conclusions until indicators of deception are compared to a baseline and evaluated in clusters and context of the questions.

Although experts on this subject matter differ as it relates to the significance of various indicators for deception and the ability of someone trained in this subject to detect deception, I think that many would concur that if interviewers would simply stop taking notes when an applicant is responding to their question, they would have a much better chance of spotting signs of stress or actions that could be indicators of deception that require further exploring. You don't need to be what some  refer to as a "wizard" to spot a lie; you simply need to pay close attention to the clues that are often very obvious.

Hiring an honest applicant can save your organization substantial money by improving results in safety, security, productivity, customer service and profit. Please call Jim at 215-460-7370 or contact him at jimmcguffey@verizon.net with additional questions on this important subject matter and other security services at http://www.armoredcarexpert.com 

April 14, 2011

Business to Business Web-Marketing of Security Products & Services

Security Source Online

 
Security Source Members Have Security Solutions
 
The diverse security industry continues to evolve and expand worldwide. Methodologies that were appropriate ten years ago are rapidly being upgraded. Whether the goal is to secure an elementary school, a hospital, a shopping center or a large industrial plant the security program must be multifaceted and adaptive to specific needs. Those that are responsible for securing these facilities are required to deal with a number differentiated security providers.

Some organizations require a consultant, a security system integrator and/or a video surveillance vendor in addition to many other service providers. Finding the proper assemblage of security providers is a daunting task. It is even more difficult if multiple site locations are involved. This task would be infinitely simplified if these customers were able to turn to a single resource that would be capable of meeting their varied needs. SSO provides that resource.

Security Source Online (SSO) is stepping into this void by providing a single source for a diverse grouping of security professionals, products and services. Security Source Online is the brain-child of William Nesbitt, CPP, a well seasoned Board Certified Security Professional. In addition to Bill, the website’s advisory board members are all Certified Protection Professionals. These individuals are profiled on this website.

This website is also unique in that it offers one year memberships to security providers for a single annual fee. A distinctive aspect of SSO is that the website is also a blog where members only can post informative articles. However, any visitor to the website has the ability to make commentary to any posted blog thereby making SSO interactive.

Security Source Online provides those with security needs direct unfettered access to their vendor of choice. Additionally, SSO members are encouraged to form collaborative relationships with fellow members in order to best serve the collective needs of their clients and to provide clients with a single source for a plethora of security products and services. Over time this website will become the gold standard as a reliable resource for security products and services. Interested parties will be able to find everything from access control system providers and manufacturers to forensic security expert witnesses. This website will become a resource for finding security guard companies, system integrators. IT security specialists as well as forensic security experts.

Security Source Online represents the next generation in effective security services marketing while at the same time providing interested parties with ideas and solutions for difficult problems through informational blogs. The blog portion of this website ensures that Security Source Online is interactive.
 
Those who are interested in becoming members will note that annual membership fees are at a low introductory rate for a limited time only.
April 3, 2011

Meet Our Security Source Online Security Professionals

Security Source is a unique website that is intended to provide a resource for those needing solve security challenges. This site is rapidly becoming an international resource for a wide range of diverse security providers. As our membership grows, visitors to Security Source will be able to have direct access to security integrators, security consultants, forensic security experts, security systems companies and contract security providers. Visitors are able to have direct unfettered access to any of our members. Our members are represented by organizations that have regional, national as well as international capability.

A unique aspect of the Security Source Website is that it is also a Security Topic Blog. SSO members have the exclusive rights to post informative blogs. However, any visitor to the SSO has the ability to comment to any blog. The blog portion of the website is to encourage an open dialogue between those seeking security solutions and our diverse group of security pros. We encourage visitors to SSO to suggest topics for our members to address through the SSO blogosphere. If any visitor to our website is unable to find the expertise they are looking, contact Bill Nesbitt, CPP the Director of Security Source Online (bill@securitysourceonline.com). We will endeavor to refer you to an organization that can meet your needs.

Many of our members have national as well as international name recognition within the security industry. If a visitor is unable to find the security provider they are looking for, there is a very good chance that one of our members can put you in touch with the provider who will fill the bill. You will also find the many of our members are willing to work collaboratively when needs dictate. This is especially true of those security professionals who are members of the Security Source Online Roundtable.

Security Source is the place to find workplace violence prevention experts. SSO also has a growing number of experts who understand mitigation strategies for the protection of information. Other professional are experts at security program assessment and development. Our technical experts are able to help clients maximize the return on investment with limited security budgets. These professional are able to provide security design support and help their client develop RFPs.

Fencing with CCTV Camera

If you are a user of security equipment such as access management systems, video surveillance systems or contract security guards, Security Source Members are here to help you meet those needs. If you are unable to find the service provider you need, please contact us and we will refer to the appropriate vendors. If the service provider is not yet represented on our website, try contacting one of our security consultant members for suggestions.

If your business provides security services or security equipment, consider joining the Security Source family of professionals.

Finally, if you wish to see articles posted that deal with specific security challenges, contact us and we will alert the most qualified SSO Member to contribute an article. We also invite you to vote our current poll questions. Come back and visit us again as we continue to grow.

You may also contact our webmaster at: brandi@securitysourceonline.com

February 22, 2011

Security Strategies Require On-Going Maintenance

I recently read several news articles regarding a large amount of coin that was scheduled to arrive at a bank but somehow vanished. A subsequent law suit filed by the bank is pending against the security firm to recover these funds. In this case the missing or stolen coin exceeded 100 bags. It is unclear from news sources whether this huge amount of coin was actually stolen while enroute to the armored car facility for processing or if this coin ever left the armored car facility. There have been numerous incidents involving substantially larger amounts of missing coin but for those outside the industry, this incident comes as quite a surprise.

What happened to so much coin and how could it disappear with all of the accounting and balancing systems that armored car companies have in place to verify and process cash and coin? Even David Copperfield would require preparation to make that amount of coin disappear all at once!

Most thefts or mysterious disappearances result from a breakdown in established security processes. These breakdowns most often occur when someone decides to take a short cut to save time or money. All too often these short cuts are overlooked by management which in the eyes of the employees implies that the procedures are not necessary.

These sorts of losses occurred prior to the advent of technology and will continue regardless of technological advances. The most frustrating part of asset management occurs when an organization invests large sums of capital for state of the art integrated security strategies only to fail because of a weak maintenance process. No organization is exempt to include the government or well funded corporations.

While organizations boast of utilizing state of the art technology in security systems to protect assets, this is of little value without following basic security principles and best practices. Thefts will occur regardless of existing technology and protection systems; however, if a security risk analysis is conducted and the maintenance portion of the process is monitored, audited, managed and revised as needed, theft will be reduced and organizations will continue to benefit from technology.

Not with standing, technology can be a double edge sword such as was the case when several hundred million dollars in stolen art occurred last year at a Paris museum when an alarm system failed allowing intruders easy access. It was later discovered that the alarm system has not worked in several weeks. Technology in this incident served as a detriment since management took for granted that the system worked and relied to a large degree on it for protection.

I would need additional information regarding the missing coin to provide a professional opinion but a likely scenario is that a cardinal rule and best practice in the cash-in-transit business of “always getting and giving a receipt” was not followed. There were also other checks and balances that were probably ignored that allowed this large amount of coin to vanish into thin air. Perhaps the coin never left the coin depot. Coin can easily disappear at a cash center unless daily audits are performed and the coin is secured and properly monitored.

In these incidents involving the disappearance of substantial coin and valuable art pieces, there is much more at risk than can be equated in dollars. In these incidents, the loss of reputation to the organization charged with protecting the coin and the art work poses the largest threat since existing and future business opportunities may be at risk.

This is especially true with the advent of the internet and social media since bad news travels fast. I was surprised with real time communication that this incident was not twitted around the world as so many substantially lesser incidents end up on You-Tube, Face Book and Twitter all within minutes following the occurrence.
Disclaimer:  This article is written for general information purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a primary source for making security decisions.

About the Author:  Jim McGuffey, CPP is board certified in security management with 40 years security and safety management experience. He is owner of A.C.E. Security Consultants www.acesecurityconsultants.com  Jim earned a B.A. in Criminal Justice and a M.A. in Management. Prior to joining the armored car industry where he served in the roles of Area General Manager, District Manager and Regional Vice President for 20 years, he served 3 years in the military and 8 years in law enforcement.  Jim can be contacted at jimmcguffey@verizon.net  or 215-460-7370.

February 17, 2011

Security Source: Putting Those With Security Needs Together With Security Problem Solvers

Security Source Online (SSO) is a marketing forum for our members and a source of usable information to those seeking security solutions. The blog entries and resources listed on this site are continually updated. For those seeking information, contact us if you are unable to find the answers you are seeking. Blog entries are restricted to members, but any site visitor is able to respond to an existing blog.

 All the businesses listed on this site are represented by real people. Anyone can make direct contact with any of our security professionals. Every member of Security Source is an independent security provider. This means that any visitor can contact more than one provider in order to make an informed decision. Despite the independence of our members, many of our members are willing to collaborate if the best interests of the customer are served; this is especially true of members of our Roundtable. This may be a beneficial alternative for clients that have a diversity of needs or who requires services at multiple locations. 

As this site grows companies will become members that may have a national and even an international presence. Security Source encourages these companies to join with multiple memberships on a regional basis. No matter how large the members company, Security Source requires that the company is represented by a responsible individual. None of our members feel the need to hide behind anonymity. There is some validity is the old adage that national and international companies are only as good as their local operations. 

If you are visiting this site seeking a security provider and are unable to find an individual or company to satisfy your needs, contact any of our independent security consulting firms. These firms will endeavor to put you in touch with the appropriate provider. There is no charge for this support service. 

Questions regarding this site may be directed to bill@securitysourceonline.com or you may call 805/410-2300.

August 1, 2010

Security Source Online is Open for Business

www.SecuritySourceOline.com (SSO) is open for business. This marketing/informational site is unique because the site is managed and overseen by seasoned security professionals, not marketeers. Security Source Online provides the vehicle for the marketing of a wide range of security services and products on one hand, and on the other hand a source for practical information aimed at the mitigation of security threats. The SSO advisory board consists of security professionals representing the breadth and width of the United States and can be found on the website.

This website is unique because it serves two purposes. First it is a resource for security information. The site contains an ever growing number of blogs that address variety of security subject matter. SSO blogs are responsive to problems and questions posed by those seeking answers to difficult problems. No legitimate security topics are ignored. The site also provides links to a number of current security news stories. All blog postings are screened to ensure they are truly informational as opposed to being thinly veiled advertisements. The best way to advertise is to provide usable information for those looking for answers. We want visitors to the site to return again and again, not only to locate problem solvers and security equipment when needed, but to also find ideas for mitigation security threats.

Second, as mentioned this site is intended to be a resource for those truly need professional security problem solvers. As our membership grows SecuritySourceOnline.com will become the place to go when security expertise is needed. SSO members will consist of security integrators, security consultants, forensic security experts, alarm companies, security equipment providers, contract security providers, fraud investigators and information security experts. As this site grows, you will find security expertise representatives from all over the world. SSO members represent such disciplines as hospitality security, healthcare security, retail security, information security, supply chain security and many other security disciplines.

The Security Source Online Group had been on LinkedIn for only about a year and has more than 1300 members. Within this group there have been numerous and diverse discussions. SSO on LinkedIn is testimony to the wide range on interest in this unique approach. The Security Source Online Group on LinkedIn continues to attract a diversified group of international security expertise, as well as those seeking answers to difficult challenges, and will continue to do so. On LinkedIn about half of the members of Security Source Online Group members are security providers with the other half being security services users. One of the goals of the SSO LinkedIn group is to encourage thoughtful interaction between users and providers with a minimal amount of commercialism. SSO will provide access to regional providers as members with both a national and international presence as well as those providers who serve local markets.

Our security provider members are encouraged to address the issues of the day by posting topical and thoughtful articles on our blog. We want visitors to SSO to consider the site to be a resource of current security management and security program development information. Those seeking security products or services will be afforded direct access to any of our members with no middle-man interference. Any member who does not maintain high ethical standards will be removed from the site immediately.

The site also hosts a Speaker’s Bureau for those members who provide special insights within the ever-changing world of security services and security technology my making educational public presentations. The SSO Speaker’s Bureau consists of individuals who regularly making presentations of ASIS Internationals and other prestigious trade organizations. Those members of the SSO Speaker’s Bureau understand that our role is to inform as opposed to making forty five minute sale pitches.

Finally, the Security Source Online Roundtable is comprised of individuals who hold widely recognized professional certifications in the various security discipline members. A condition of Roundtable membership is a willingness to form strategic partnerships other Security Source Online Members, in order to meet the synergistic needs of clients they serve. These partnerships will afford SSO member clients with a single point of contact as well as the capability to serve many geographic locals in a coordinated and cohesive manner.

Those interested in becoming a member of the Security Source Online family are now able to do so at a very low annual fee. These low introductory sign up fees will be available on a very limited time basis only. Our goal is to provide an international security resource for those individuals and organizations seeking security information and providers of security related services.

July 13, 2010

The Role of Perception in Effective Security Management

Over the past three or four years, Security Management Services International, Inc. has been using a Likert style Security Questionnaire which we have developed. We generally use this questionnaire as a precursor to providing our clients with a complete security assessment. Over these past few years we have recorded responses from thousands of respondents across the country. The security questionnaire is posted online with a unique username and password for each client. The respondents are all afforded anonymity. They are also invited to make any comments they wish. Clearly this questionnaire measures perception and hopefully reality. Typically this Questionnaire is posted well in advance of the assessment process and remains available through the assessment process.

In part, this questionnaire provides us with insights we otherwise might not have, long before we ever step on campus. This technique has underscored the powerful role perception has on the effectiveness of security programs. This means, for example, if by any objective measure, you have a well designed security program, but most employees perceive the program as substandard, guess what? You’ve got an ineffective security program. If you are a security manager, you have at least two choices: Change the security program, or change the perception. It is not infrequent that we encounter this disconnect.
 
This Likert style questionnaire produces interesting, quantifiable metrics, but often the real nuggets of actionable information is derived from the voluntary comments provided under the protection of anonymity. Many of these comments are detailed and lengthily. These comments provide us with pieces of string for us to follow when we arrive in site. We are able not only able to measure perception against reality, but more over we are able to gain insights as to the reasons some perceptions fly in the face of reality. Moreover, security programs are more effective when employees are able to participate in the process. Additionally, in face to face interactions we are able to determine the etiology of both favorable as well as unfavorable perceptions.

The point we are trying to make in this very brief presentation is that effective security programs must be cognizant as to how they are actually impacting behavior. Behaviors are often driven more by perception than reality. Security is all about behavior modification. Clearly a discipline that understands this concept is CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design). Perception has everything to do with deterrence. Think about it. The deterrent value of a security officer, a camera or a fence is clearly the product of the collective perceptions of those whom these methodologies are intended to affect. If everyone perceives that no one is paying attention to the images produced by the cameras watching the parking lot, how much deterrent value do those cameras have?

Finally:  It is not what you say, but what is heard.
             It is not what you show, but what is seen.
             It is not what you mean, but what is understood.
             Perception is indeed, reality.

William H. Nesbitt, CPP
President
Security Management Services International, Inc

January 27, 2010

The Broken Window Theory - CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design)

SECURITY PROGRAMS SHOULD START WITH THE BASICS & THEN BUILD - What do you think?
Use your imagination and picture two shopping malls across the street from one another, one on the left and one on the right. Or if you prefer, picture two apartment complexes across the street for one another, one on the left and one on the right.
Let’s assume that the property on the left side of the street is not well kept. There are a few broken windows, there is trash blowing about the parking lot some of the exterior lights are burned out. Let’s also assume that the property on the right side of the street is clean, it is well lit and burned out lights and broken windows are immediately repaired. The property is well landscapes and bushes are regularly trimmed.
Which of these properties has higher rates of crime?
If one hospital’s materials management storeroom is disheveled, cartons are half full with contents spilling out while the storeroom of the hospital down the street is orderly with a well run inventory control program, which one is likely to have a serious shrink problem?
Security is not just about guards, CCTV and alarm systems. It is also about behavior modification, security awareness programs and good housekeeping. If a warehouse or property looks unkempt and is poorly maintained, the odds are that crime will increase, both internally and externally. The disheveled storeroom sends the message that: “If you steal something from here it will go undetected.” Good housekeeping as a security device may also be applied to landscaping, lighting and graffiti eradication programs.
At Security Management Services International (SMSI) we often suggest to our clients that these CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) principals should be applied early in the security program enhancement process, in part, because many of these remedies do not come with a big price tag. The application of CPTED principals will positively enhance the deterrent impact of more traditional approaches such as surveillance systems, access control systems and uniform security officers. In fact, in the absence of the techniques, the application of more traditional security methodologies will actually be diminished.
William H. Nesbitt, CPP
President
Security Management Services International, Inc.
January 1, 2010

How do you make apples & oranges security decisions? The Answer: Metrics

No two guard companies are the same. No two alarms companies are the same. How do you know what company to choose?
When security challenges turn up, how do you decide what mitigation strategy to apply? How do you decide how much of one remedy to apply as opposed to an alternative remedy? When you uncover threats, how do you know how serious the threat is on a scale of one to ten? What is the predicate on which your security budget is based upon and what is the targeted return on investment for that budget commitment?
The answers are that security decisions must be data driven. This means that risks and threats must be quantified in a manner that expresses the probability of occurrence. Proposed mitigation strategies must be framed in quantitative terms that define risk reduction. Back in the old days, one of the measures retailers applied to measuring the effectiveness of their theft abatement program was to compute the total dollar value of recovered merchandise through the shoplifter apprehension program. I remember hearing a retail security director proudly telling me that he had increased his recoverables by more than 15% over the previous year. However, it is very likely that this number was an expression of increased thefts and a reflection of a failed theft prevention program.
The point is, with a little creative thinking, those charged with making security decisions must do so predicated on factual data, and more importantly, a combination of data. Going forward, it is important to track the effectiveness of your program and to have the capacity to apply analytics to that data.
This process should be embodied in as many decisions as possible. If your company is contemplating hiring a contract guard service, will you be looking for the lowest bidder? That may or may not be an acceptable criterion. If the guard company you hired performs in a negligent manner and your company is on the losing end of a multi-million dollar lawsuit, maybe the low bid decision isn’t the best way to go.
When doing business with any security vendor, you should be trying to determine which vendor with provide your organization with the best value, not necessarily the best price. This means that you must develop a multidimensional matrix that allows you to score each vendor on a set of common criteria. Consider this: It may be that the vendor with the highest price provides the highest return on investment.
At some point in time, an objective baseline security/risk assessment is a must. This is one way to avoid compounding the mistakes of the past. Risk assessment will utilize incident history, police data and data from organizations such as the CAP Index. Moving forward all security activity must be tracked in a manner that facilitates statistical analysis and trend project. The usage of products such as Perspective from PPM 2000 is well advised.
The suggestions mentioned herein are rapidly becoming normative.
November 12, 2009

Tyco’s Security Design & Technology Symposium 2009

Bill Nesbitt, CPP, President of Security Management Services International, Inc. (SMSI) and Ron Lander, CPP, CMAS, Executive Vice President of SMSI, recently attended the Security Design & Technology Symposium in Chandler, Arizona. This Symposium was sponsored by Tyco International Companies: Software House, American Dynamics and KANTECH.
 
In order to better serve the customers of Security Management Services International www.smsiinc.com
Bill and Ron believe that their role, in part, is to keep abreast of the ever expanding use of technology as a tool to mitigate security problems and provide real world solutions for our clients.  Ron Lander stated “We were looking for different integration perspectives, due to our frequent risk assessments that unveil multiple incompatible systems that are in need of integration on a common platform.” Tyco conducted an informative workshop that was not laden with implicit sales pitches, but rather their goal was to inform and to listen to security practitioners and the challenges they are facing where the rubber meets the road.
 
Like any symposium worth attending, at least half of the benefits gained from attending stems from the “networking” with other attendees. Security technology has evolved to the point where one can frequently do more with less, with a little foresight. Security control centers are no longer limited to being housed in the facility they are serving. A single control center can now service several regional, national or global facilities. This means there is a reduced need for designing and constructing multiple control centers. The payroll burden of FTEs for each control center is reduced when there is consolidation. This Symposium gave us an opportunity to see Tyco’s flagship integration model, along with its partners in a smooth operating environment.
 
 
When SMSI conducts a security assessment of a shopping center, a hotel, a manufacturing plant or a hospital, the mere identification of weak spots and outright breaches is useless without the offering of mitigating solutions. Those solutions must involve the participation of key stakeholders, the application of security operatives and the efficient use of technology. Security methodologies, whether through the use of security officers or video surveillance and card access systems, are really all about “behavior modification.” If the application of technology fails to positively affect behavior in a way that reduces risk, there will be little return on investment. Both the sponsors of the Symposium, as well as those in attendance, seemed to understand this reality very well. The meetings and displays were low-key and not marketing-oriented. The sponsors spent a great deal of time soliciting our collective input and the input of other consultants who specify the products, and integrators who deal with their products daily. We were also exposed to real-time case studies of successful integration by the actual practitioners.
 
It was a worthwhile two days for the good of our clients (Security Management Services International) , both present and future. The adage, “less is more,” seems to apply to this symposium. The “less” component was supported by the reality that the Tyco companies were not in a full-blown sales mode. If you are a security provider who is invited to speak to any group. such as an ASIS workshop or seminar, and instead of informing, you spend more time pitching your product or service, the end result will be that you will turn off the audience to the organization you represent. If, on the other hand, your primary goal is to inform and to listen to your potential customers, as the Tyco folks did in Arizona, everyone wins. This symposium succeeded in spending less capital on selling and much more capital on informing.
 
November 12, 2009

Security Source Online: The Website

The Security Source Online (SSO) (www.securitysourceonline.com) blog is about to morph into a unique website. The goal of this website will be to facilitate the ability of this site to meet the mission of becoming an all inclusive Security Source for those seeking answers to security problems and those seeking credible security solutions. Security Source has engaged the services of a web design/SEO company (Magical Productions) to facilitate this transition.
 
SSO will continue to produce security information, news of the day and emerging trends. SSO will also continue to conduct surveys that are of interest to the security industry and to the public at large. As a security professional for the past 30+ years, I continually receive phone queries asking for security advice and questions regarding where to find security resources. These inquiries lead me to believe that there is a need for the establishment of a resource for security information as well as a wide range of security resources.
 
In order to fulfill this need, Security Source Online (SSO) will become a meeting place where those with security needs will be able to find security solutions. Those solutions may come in the form of information gained from the postings of our contributors. However, often the provision of mere information is insufficient. Organizations, corporations and individuals often need the services of security professionals as well as those that provide security products and services.
 
SSO will meet those needs by providing searchable listings of security providers. These listings will soon be available on a subscription basis. It is intended that these listings will be searchable for specific vertical markets, by region and/or by products and services offered. It is intended the SSO will become s resource for security products and service for small and large businesses, security managers and even the general public.
 
Those who list with SSO will be invited to contribute informational articles to the site and to offer commentary on the security news of the day. We also envision that subscribers would be able to publish employment opportunities for a very nominal fee.
 
Security Source Online is unique in that the site is managed by security professionals who understand client needs and the security industry as a whole. SSO will truly become the place where security problems meet security solutions.
July 16, 2009

Good Security is About Behavior Modification

What is the purpose of every security program, security policy, security device and/or security barrier, to name a few? Answer: To alter behavior!
 
B. F. Skinner (March 20, 1904 – August 18, 1990) was an American psychologist, author, inventor, advocate for social reform, and a poet. He was a Psychology Professor at Harvard University from 1958 until his retirement in 1974.He is the father of Behavioral Psychology. He originated the operant conditioning chamber, innovated his own philosophy of science called Radical Behaviorism, and founded his own school of experimental research psychology—the experimental analysis of behavior. He discovered and advanced the rate of response as a dependent variable in psychological research. In a recent survey, Skinner was listed as the most influential psychologist of the 20th century.
 
B.F. Skinner’s view of human behavior represented a significant change to the prevailing wisdom of the day represented by the works and theories of Sigmund Freud. Freud believed that an individual’s behavior was rooted in their past. He saw behavior as predetermined. Freud is best known for his theories of the unconscious mind and the defense mechanism of repression and for creating the clinical practice of psychoanalysis for curing psychopathology through dialogue between a patient and a psychoanalyst. Freud is also renowned for his redefinition of sexual desire as the primary motivational energy of human life, as well as his therapeutic techniques, including the use of free association, his theory of transference in the therapeutic relationship, and the interpretation of dreams as sources of insight into unconscious desires.
 
Both Freud and Skinner did research in the changing of behavior. Freud seemed adopt notion that the behavior of individuals could be modified by punishing negative behavior. Skinner added to this notion when he found that the incremental rewarding of positive behavior could affect long lasting change.
 
All of these concepts are implicit in any security program or in any security design. Managing a security program is like trying to prove a negative by trying to stop something bad from happening, despite the fact you can’t be sure something bad would have happened if you did nothing. Most security programs accomplish their mission through the use of implied (if not real) threats of punishments and rewards. This means that the way a security program is perceived is even more important than how good the security program is in actuality.
 
For example, consider one of the most fundamental security devices, the fence. Does a chain-link fence topped of with three stands of barbed wire protect property because it is an impenetrable barrier or does protect property because it sends a message, “Do not pass”? This analogy could be applied to a security officer, to a CCTV camera, or an alarm. The fence impacts the offender’s perception and that perception alters behavior.
 
If one accepts these theses, security programs must exert more emphasis on affecting the perceptions of all affected parties in order affect behavior. Those affected parties may include employees, customers, visitors and would-be perpetrators. This means security programs must be built from back to front. Rather than determining where the security program should go, the better question revolves around what outcomes should the security program produce. In considering the intended outcomes of security programs, one must determine how the symbolism of various security methodologies will affect behavior. The intended result is prevention and deterrence. If the security program is perceived to be a toothless tiger, deterrence goes out the window.
 
It is also important that the security program convey the perceptions that illegal or dishonest behavior has consequences. Experience shows us that those enterprises that rigorously investigate all internal crime and terminate and/or prosecute the offenders have fewer security incidents, because potential offenders perceive that the tiger has teeth.
 
Let us consider risk/benefit ratios. The Wall Street Journal postulated the “red face test” when deciding how much security do I need. In other words, if you security is beached, will you be red-faced?  Clearly the basis for any security program, whether a home, a nuclear power plant, or a hospital, the question will need to be answered, “How much security do I need to reduce risk to an acceptable level?” Additionally the risk/reward ratio for the perpetrator should also be part of the equation. The goal is to raise the perpetrator’s risk of being apprehended to be greater than the reward he or she would receive if successful.
 
Keeping Freud and Skinner in mind, the behavior modification component is clear. We want to reinforce and reward good behavior and punish bad behavior, or at least present a credible threat of impeding punishment.
 
Let’s consider some practical examples. In some applications employees perceive that the security system is omnipotent and therefore will mitigate all threats, negating the need for their active involvement and vigilance. We occasionally find this perception in hospitals. For example, some mother/baby units that employ the use of electronic tags, CCTV and alarms have experienced breaches because the clinical staff ignored the obvious. In shopping centers customers are comforted by the presence of cameras, but how would they feel if they knew no one was watching the cameras. Conversely, how much deterrence would be achieved by those same cameras if would-be perpetrators knew the cameras were not being monitored?
 
Security personnel can significantly enhance the deterrent value of existing security devices without any increase in cost. By applying behavior modification techniques as an active security strategy, any enterprise can do more with less. Just ask the question before moving forward: What is the desired behavioral outcome we are seeking?
 
If you need specifics, please respond to this blog or go to our LinkedIn site (see below) and join our group Security Source Online. Please vote the poll question on our blog.
 
William H. Nesbitt, CPP
President
Security Management Services International, Inc.
1168 Pan Court
Newbury Park, CA 91320
 
Phone: 805-499-3800
Mobile: 805-410-2300
 
July 6, 2009

Contract Security Guards or Proprietary (In-House) Guards

There are strong opinions on both sides of the question as to which is better, contract security officers or in-house security officers. Most of the time when I am asked the question as to which I would recommend, the questioner usually has a strong opinion, one way or the other. There really is no correct answer to the question. For one thing, all contract and proprietary guard operations are not created equally. In other words there is good and bad on either side of the question.
For example, I have seen a few proprietary guard operations that were so corrupt that they were beyond redemption. The only alternative was to disband the in-house operations and begin searching for an effective guard company to fill the bill. I have also worked with clients who have used the same guard service company for over ten years and there was no good reason to change.
All other things being equal considerations of operating cost, control, liability and consistency are all factors that must be part of the decision equation. If you total up all operational costs and your organization is tied to a rather inflexible budget, contract service may be the way to go. Having said that, going with the lowest bidder is usually a mistake. It is therefore important to develop an RFP that allows for comparing apples with apples. With some companies the value-added services that are part of the bundle, may make the difference. With the wrong company, the initial savings achieved from going with a low-baller can easily be gobbled up when you find yourself named in a lawsuit.
If there is a daily requirement that your organization will need to micromanage the day to day activities of the officers, proprietary may be the way to go. Employee turnover can also be a problem with contract services, especially if your primary decision factor is price. Even moderate turnover can be a problem for some industries, such as hospitals. In hospital security programs site knowledge as well as customs and practices are very important. There are very few black and white security decisions in hospital security.  On a daily basis hospital security officers will be required to make judgment calls several times a day.
On the other hand some security directors prefer their own employees because they want more control. However, one cannot assume you will not have control with contract officers.
The point I’m trying to make is don’t make the wrong decision for the wrong reasons. Don’t allow preconceived notions to influence your tough process. If you decide to come down on the side of contract security officers, than you must choose the right vendor. We suggest that you build a decision making matrix so that you can objectively making comparisons using a reliable set of criteria. Seek input from peers and consultants you trust and respect. One more hint, the quality of the security guard labor force usually goes up during time of high unemployment. Conversely during times of high employment the quality of the labor pool goes south, especial if your organization is paying a low hourly rate. This reality applies to both contract and proprietary security personnel. Geographic wage and salary benchmarking is available.
 
Submitted by:
William H. Nesbitt, CPP
President
Security Management Services International, Inc.
1168 Pan Court
Newbury Park, CA 91320
 
Phone: 805-499-3800
Mobile: 805-410-2300
May 16, 2009

Security Budgets – Doing More With Less

Cutting security budgets does not necessarily mean cutting security programs. Sometimes a tough economy forces all of us to adapt and often do better. Organizations and programs that are able to survive, and maybe even thrive in a recession will likely assume dominance going forward. During economic downturns organizations and institutions are often forced to engage in introspection and self examination. This can be a positive exercise.
Over time, many organizations have become inefficient and bloated and fail to deliver reasonable return on investment (ROI). In a booming economy deficiencies that have built up over time are either not spotted or simply ignored. Yet during an economic backslide the errors of the past are often exacerbated by the act of making arbitrary cuts. Often these cuts are made despite the fact that these reductions may have the net effect of exposing the organization to even greater risks and vulnerabilities, a condition rife for lawsuits. The key then is to make cuts, while at the same time, without diminishing the effectiveness of the security program.
Before going any further the following assumption is critical: Security is a situational discipline. One size does not fit all. The efficacy and adequacy of any security program is determined by a wide range of individuated demographic factors. Unlike other programs, such as safety programs, security programs do not lend themselves to universal solutions.
If it is mandated that your security program must be cut, what would you do?
The first step in the self examination process is to determine where the program is now and how it got there. The only way to make these determinations is to commission a comprehensive security review. The advantages of having an outside consulting firm conduct the security program review are objectivity and comparative experience. Some security managers perceive outside consultants as a threat. The opposite is usually the case. Security Consultants are more likely going to make the on-site security managers more successful and will help them achieve more with less.
Next, it is important the assessment process and the resultant security programs that emerge are metric driven. The security programs must also make objective sense to chief financial officer and any other interested bean counters. This means that conclusions and decisions can no longer be driven by intuitiveness and professional judgment. They must be data driven. If the tracking and analytic systems are not in place, they must be initiated. Tracking and analytic data systems can be acquired from companies such as PPM 2000 (www.ppm2000.com). Systems like these are an important ingredient, moving forward, ensuring the security program remains contemporary.
Once the assessment process is completed, it is important that the consulting firm recommends efficient solutions. In the last fifteen years security technology has advanced to the point of allowing the security professional to do more with less. Without ignoring the principal that security is a situational discipline, within the confines of any security programs there are still substantial opportunities for consolidation and some limited standardization.
Although within some circles “out-sourcing” is a dirty word, it is not an all or none proposition. There are pros and cons to proprietary versus contract security services. Again, even this choice does not need one or the other. It can be a combination of both.
Security Management Services International (www.smsiinc.com) has teamed up with PPM 2000 to offer Security Management Support to existing security programs in an attempt to bring added professionalism and experience (150 years of accumulated diverse security management experience). This service, by monitoring and supporting the existing security program, increases effectiveness without the layering on an additional level of payroll burden.  Remember, security errors, even under the best of intentions, can cost millions.
The critical point is, until you fully understand where you are now, and how you got here, the security program will flounder and may well be doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past going forward. Most security evaluations result in lowered cost in the aggregate. If you are asked to cut your security budget, view this request as an opportunity to get better.
Security Management Services International offers a clear alternative to outsourcing. Under SMSI’s Security Management Support Program the client maintains the existing security managers and supervisors. SMSI simply becomes another member of the team by playing a vital supportive role and brings 150 years of security expertise toward making the security program better and more cost effective without the added payroll burden. The efficiencies gained could easily offset the cost of this service. For more information, email Bill Nesbitt, CPP at: bill@smsiinc.com or call 805-499-3800.
May 12, 2009

WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PREVENTION

Workplace Violence often occurs suddenly and with devastating results. These acts are largely committed against individuals, sometimes randomly as in the Virginia Tech shootings or sometimes they are committed against specific targeted individuals. The individuals who commit these acts may be career criminals, disgruntled employees or may include individuals who are involved in a domestic dispute. Workplace Violence can also result in property crimes, including industrial espionage committed by those who may have a dispute with the targeted enterprise. In some cases, there may be the added intervening variable that these acts of workplace violence are being committed by individuals who are deranged, psychotic and/or chemically impaired.
 
Any enterprise that has not recently conducted a complete security assessment, inclusive of a workplace violence threat assessment, may be exposing themselves, their customers and their employees to avoidable risk. We have all seen how tough economic times correlate with increased acts of violence in the workplace. We are seeing the spillage of domestic disputes moving into the workplace. The risk for violence cuts across all sectors, including both private and public enterprises.
 
Security Management Services International, Inc. (SMSI) cannot guarantee the mitigation of all acts of violence in the workplace. No firm can reasonably make such an assertion. However, SMSI can reasonably reduce the probability of such acts occurring through the application of comprehensive threat assessments and the implementation of prudent mitigation strategies.
 
Critical to reducing the probability of Workplace Violence, is the ability of the enterprise to recognize the potential threat, while that threat is still in the incipient phase. It is also important to remember that acts of workplace violence do not occur in a vacuum. In some cases, factors in the workplace may inadvertently give rise to these acts of violence, thereby requiring security awareness and sensitivity training.
 
Workplace Violence Prevention programs must therefore be multidimensional. These programs require training for managers and supervisors in early recognition capability as well as the skills required to avoid not becoming part of the problem. Workplace violence prevention strategies also require the application of more traditional crime prevention methodologies; the reduction of motive, means and opportunity. This requires that the integrated design of physical security remedies must also consider the impact of access management, CCTV and locking system, along with security officer training on workplace violence threat reduction. Any complete security assessment security assessment should include workplace violence threat assessment.
 
Security Management Services International (SMSI) regularly conducts comprehensive security assessments the address a wide range of security risks including workplace violence. SMSI will recommend mitigation strategies and will offer site specific employee training program aimed at early risk identification and mitigation.
 
Visit www.smsiinc.com or call Security Management Services International, Inc. at 805-499-3800.
April 27, 2009

THE WHARTON EXPERIENCE

William H. Nesbitt, CPP, recently attended the ASIS International Security Executive Program at the Wharton at the University of Pennsylvania. This article briefly explains why he attended this program and some of the benefits that were derived.
I have been a practicing security consultant since 1989. My practice has two primary thrusts, providing security expertise to a wide range of commercial and healthcare clients and the provision of security expertise as a court certified security expert. Prior to these endeavors, I spent a number of years in the contract guard industry as well as in private investigations and the electronic security industry. I became a Board Certified Protection Professional in 1978 by sitting for the very first exam held in Los Angeles. If you do the math, it’s not hard to figure out I am no spring chicken.
I was aware of the partnership ASIS International had with the Wharton School and had contemplated attending this program a year ago. I actually called ASIS Headquarters to get a few names of former attendees. I then contacted a few and the feedback I got was very favorable. Early in the spring of 2008 I again began to reconsider attending the ASIS sponsored Security Executive Program at the Wharton School. Of course by now the economy was heading south. As a security veteran of more than 30 years I first questioned whether I was over the hill for such a program and, given the economic conditions of the day, was this considerable investment prudent? This decision presented a bit of a conundrum; spending thousands of dollars for an educational program when economic times are tough.
Subsequently, I eventually believed that I needed to attend this program, precisely because the economy was going into the tank. At the eleventh hour I decided in the affirmative to register. I attended a one week session in November of 2008 and the second week in February of 2009 and never looked back. This undoubtedly turned out to be one of the best decisions I have ever made. I found this program to be intellectually invigorating and of tremendous pragmatic value. Barely a week goes by that I don’t refer to my Wharton notebooks. Because of this experience I have purchased and read about five books and continue to remain curious.
I would like to take a little time to recount with some specificity the range of practical benefits one may derive from this program. Bear in mind that as a security consultant, I knew that more than ever I would need to bring real value to my clients by not only helping them develop effective security solutions, but by also helping them develop programs that are cost-effective with demonstrable ROI.
There is a double-edged sword phenomenon that has resulted from the economic downturn. The security risks facing organizations are greater than ever, in part as a direct result of the faltering economic conditions. At the same there is an increasing squeeze down on the financial resources needed to support security budgets. In the face of rising threats there is still an inclination by some in management to cut security budgets. We have already seen several acts of violence in the workplace that have, in part, origins contingent on personal economic strife. Clearly security managers must have the required skill-sets necessary to justify their budgets with hard data. They also need to quantify the ROI their budget will actually produce. (Not always an easy task because it is akin to trying to prove a negative.)
A reasonable question therefore is: How can you best articulate, in the language of business the need to invest in proactive security programs? How can you present your strategy so the C-suite will listen and approve your recommendation? How can you manage your own resources to maximize return on investment?
One answer: The Wharton/ASIS Program for Security Executives: Making the Business Case for Security. This program offers core business knowledge from one of the nation’s leading business schools, if not in fact, the leading business school in the nation.
This quotation is worthy of consideration: "Security executives need to become business partners. We sometimes are viewed as the people you call if you have a problem. We need to be seen as partners to make sure we contribute to the business. For example, we are working on issues such as counterfeiting, grey markets, and employment terminations, all of which address key security and business issues. We need to understand the directives and strategic objectives of the corporation and look out for the best interests of the company."
—Steve Chupa, Director of Security, Worldwide Security Group, Johnson & Johnson
 
Tough economic times bring out the best and the worst in leadership. For those leaders and organizations for which a faltering economy brings out the worst, failure will always be lurking around the next corner. For those that preserver by adapting and innovating, success will be achieved and those individuals and organizations will emerge stronger than they were going in. The Wharton Program helps one obtain the tools for the latter.
 
As it turned out, this program was one of most invigorating and informative education programs I have ever attended, and I’ve attended a bunch of seminars over the past 30+ years. I looked forward to heading to the classroom each day. As much as I gained from the Wharton faculty, I also gained immeasurably for the interactions with my peers, both in and outside the classroom. I would like to highlight a few of reasons for this statement.
First, the faculty is second to none. The folks at Wharton are not ivory tower academics steeped in theory. These professors all keep one foot in the academic world and the other foot in the real world in that they all do a substantial amount of outside consulting with Fortune 100 companies down to small local enterprises, and they do so worldwide. They understand the global marketplace the global economy that the marketplace must function within. There are also the benefits derived from interaction with fellow classmates which adds to the richness of this program. Additionally, this program does not allow passive participation. The attendees are exposed to theories and operational concepts and subsequently these theories are immediately put into practice through interactive role-playing.
 
One of the highlights of week one was when all of us were exposed to teaching by analogy. The following example also helps to convey the richness of this program. Prior to making the trip to Wharton, we were all invited to read a book entitled “Killer Angels” a novel recounting the Battle Gettysburg in 1863. We subsequentially learned that the reading of this book was preparatory to spending a full day at the Gettysburg Battle site with a Certified Battle of Gettysburg Historian. One might question the relevance of studying a single civil war battle in detail while attending an executive training program at Wharton. It all became clear when, on a cold blustery November afternoon, under the branches of a large oak tree, the professor queried; “If General Lee was running General Motors today, what would his management style be? How do you think he might resolve the current crises?” Similar question were posed throughout the day requiring each of us to apply our analysis to other Generals and battlefield commanders form both the Union Army and the Confederate Army.
 
The Wharton program for security executives provides the attendee with a set of tools by which to move a security program forward in a manner consistent with the corporate culture of the affected organization. This program also recognizes that no two corporate cultures are alike and that as security professionals, we each would be required to understand the culture and mores of the organization we were dealing with when we returned home. One of universal concepts that came through loud and clear is that corporate decisions, especially those requiring budgetary resources, must be data driven and expressed in quantitative terms. This approach is clearly within the value system of those whose organizations are metric driven. To quote John Percival, a member of the Wharton faculty, “Before you ask the company to spend money, you must know how they keep score.”
 
This program is not only instructive for those seeking to develop utilitarian security plans, but it is also very helpful in providing the tools required to make it happen. The program spends significant time on the ways and means of negotiations and both internal and external marketing strategies in furtherance of an effective security plan.
 
Finally, this program also recognized that all who attend this program are not created equally. As a precursor to both sessions, those of us who signed on to the program where asked to respond to a number of diagnostic inventories. These instruments were scored at the resultant profiles were provided to each attendee. The information provided by these instruments gave each of us greater insight into out strengths, preferences and management styles. The ability to asses a situation or to enter into a negotiation is enhanced if one better understands their own strengths and weaknesses as well as their biases.
 
I’ve attended numerous seminars and workshops over the years. After attending these workshops I come home with notes and handouts. Often these materials are placed on my desk and after a few months they find their way to a bookshelf or file drawer. Every year or so, the file drawers are purged and the materials are eventually discarded and the workshop fades in to a distant memory. This result seems very unlikely with the Wharton Program. The Wharton Program for Security Executives, at least in my case, has stimulated me to learn more. I know that what works today, may not work tomorrow. This means that in order to adapt and change. I must see change coming. Clearly this program has provided the tools to meet these challenges.
 
 

William H. Nesbitt, CPP
President
Security Management Services International
1168 Pan Court
Newbury Park, CA 91320
 
Phone: 805-499-3800
Mobile: 805-410-2300
April 6, 2009

Security Management Support Program

Security Management Services International, Inc & PPM 2000
A Strategic Partnership
 
Security Management Services International, Inc. (www.smsiinc.com) is offering a unique and innovative approach to cost-effective security management. The security challenges facing enterprises in today’s economic environment can be daunting. The nature of these security challenges ranges from the threats posed by a wide range of criminal enterprise on one hand and on the other hand finding the means to address these challenges with limited and scarce resources. Security programs are asked to cut back, even as threats and risks are on the rise. Tough economic times also produce a whole new set of security concerns. This means that Security Programs must be more effective and more sophisticated while at the same time operating on tighter budgets. Security Programs must therefore be specifically targeted to meet the unique needs of the organizations they serve and this mission must accomplished efficiently with cost effectiveness.
 
Meeting these objectives requires experienced security management coupled with the application of the latest security technology. This security technology must be applied appropriately toward the solving of security problems through the effective use of CCTV, access management systems and alarm systems. When required, security vulnerabilities will need to be addressed through the effective use of security personnel, including uniformed officers. In today’s economic environment all of these decisions going forward must be data driven. Security programs that are not driven by metrics will not be effective and they will not stand the test of time.
 
In order to ensure that security programs are predicated on hard data, and that security programs remain dynamic and capable of adjusting to new and ever-changing challenges, Security Management Services International (SMSI) is offering a unique combination of cost effective services to their clients, enabling them to meet the challenges of tomorrow with cost-efficiency.
 
In order to deliver these security management services, SMSI has formed a Strategic Partnership with PPM2000 (www.ppm2000.com), the world leader in the development of Security Management Software. Through the useof PPM 2000’s Perspective Premium Incident Management Package, SMSI will beable to monitor their clients’ security events. This will allow SMSI to spot trends early-on and make the necessary adjustments aimed at extinguishing sparks well before they become fires.
 
The SMSI Security Management Support Program (SMS) is intended to support existing security programs by providing less experienced in-house security managers with the support of a group of highly experienced Board Certified Protection Professionals Certified in Security Management. This management support will be facilitated through the use of PPM 2000’s Perspective Premium Security Management Software. This software will be provided by SMSI on a subscription basis and will reside on a secure hosted site with no local software installation required.
 
SMSI Assumptions
  • The client has, or is considering implementation of an enterprise-wide formal security program and strategy.
  • The program has a designated security manager or an individual responsible for oversight of the security program in addition having other managerial responsibilities.
  • The security program has or intends to include the application of security measures, that may include, but is not limited to:
    • Access management system
    • Closed circuit television usage
    • Alarm system
    • Information protection programs
    • Uniformed security personnel
      • Contract
      • Proprietary
    • Investigation personnel
  • The enterprise is composed of an excess of 100 employees
 
Security Mananagement Support Components
The basic components of Security Management Services International’s Security Mananagement Support Program include, but are not limited to:
 
  • An initial comprehensive security assessment. (It is important to establish a foundational basis from which to move ahead and to build upon moving forward.)
    • Physical security audit
      • Lighting
      • CPTED (Crime Prevention Though Environmental Design)
      • CCTV
      • Access management
        • Card system
        • Locking systems
      • Security personnel usage
    • Pre-employment practices
    • Inventory and supply chain management security
    • Exterior and perimeter security
    • Security training needs
    • Security awareness programs
    • Internal & external crime threat levels
 
  • Development of a Security Plan
    • Mission statement
    • Job descriptions
    • Workplace Violence Prevention
    • Metrics
    • RFP development if deemed necessary
      • Vendor selection oversight
 
  • Initiation of Perspective Premium Incident Management System
    • Establishment of the Perspective Premium Incident Management program
    • Security Management Support in setting up Perspective to ensure it meets site specific needs
      • Establishment of Perspective reporting, and other output functionality
        • Customized Reports
        • Charts
        • Graphs
        • Multimedia Presentation Capabilities
        • “State of the Art” Analytics
      • Ensuring that security decisions are data driven
 
  • Establishment of Security Management Support structure
    • Development and defining the support role of Security Management Services International, including but not limited to:
        • Determination of Site visits per year
        • Unlimited phone/online support service
        • Incident management protocol
        • Initiation and promulgation of Security Awareness Program
    • Response to special needs protocol
 
  • Investment
    • A one-time modest retainer
    • Contract for One Monthly Fee for Security Management Services, inclusive of the Perspective Premium monthly subscription
 
  • Benefits
    • These combined services clearly fit the description that “The whole is greater than the sum of the parts.”
    • The value of these bundled services is greater than the cost of the individual components.
    • The likelihood of reduced liability.
    • The reduction of both internal and external losses.
    • The assurance of achieving greater value and return on investment from the accumulated security vendors.
    • The result of maintaining a contemporary security program that addresses the needs of today and tomorrow.
 
Summation
Security Management Services International, Inc., through its Security Management Support Program is offering an innovative and unique alternative for the management of the security needs for a wide range of clientele. Organizations that may benefit from this innovative approach to security management include, but are not limited to:
§ Hospitals
§ Shopping centers
§ Apartment complexes and HOAs
§ Retirement and Elder-Care facilities
§ High-Rise Commercial Buildings
§ Manufacturing plants
§ Bio-Tech facilities
§ Educational institutions
§ Hotels
 
SMSI does not seek to replace the existing security program, its management and/or personnel. This programhas as a primary mission of enhancing the existing security program by improving its value added impact to the organization it serves. All too often securitydecisions areintuitively derived and may or may not sufficiently address specific needs. SMSI believes that security programs should be need drivenpredicated on hard data.       
January 17, 2009

Proprietary Security vs. Contracted Security Services: THE MIDDLE GROUND

Like many of the services that businesses require the question often arises weather to outsource services or to keep them in-house. For example, institutions such as hospitals outsource the management of food services, facilities management, housekeeping and the pharmacy. In the foregoing example the management may outsourced while the rank and file employees of these departments work directly for the hospital. With other businesses such as shopping malls, manufacturing plants and high-rise office buildings, the management remains in-house while the employees are contracted from agencies with a specialized skill-set, such as security guard agencies and custodial services.
 
There are advantages and disadvantages to outsourcing. As mentioned, outsourcing agencies offer a specialized skill set and therefore may perform the service better and more efficiently than could be achieved if the operations remained in-house. These same benefits, plus potential cost savings may result from contracted management and/or contracted employees, such as food service workers. The ability to stay within preplanned budgets is often facilitated by outsourcing.
 
The model most generally followed for security services is the management function almost always stays in house, but security personnel, such as officers and investigators may either be directly employed by the enterprise or they may be contract employees who work for companies like Securitas or Guardsmark.
 
In today’s tough economic climate security programs are going to have to be efficient and provide quantifiable return on investment. Security decisions, such as determining how many guards are needed, how many cameras are needed or how many card readers are needed, are going have to meet specific quantifiable needs and produce measureable results (metrics). Security managers will be required to justify their budgets to CFOs in terms of projected return on investment.
 
Security Management Services International, Inc. (SMSI Inc.) based in Newbury Park, California offers a set of unique security services aimed at improving security for their clients in an efficient and cost-effective manner. SMSI Inc. (www.smsiinc.com) through their Security Management Support programs is able to support security programs that are wholly proprietary, wholly contracted or a combination of both. The foundational basis for these services starts with a comprehensive security assessment culminating in a set of recommendations aimed at ensuring that the resultant security program is need driven.
 
Once the foundational basis for the security program is established and agreed to going forward, SMSI is able to provide any number of support services aimed at keeping the security program contemporary. Security is a dynamic discipline and security programs must continually be adjusted to meet emerging risks and threats. Therefore some of the services offered include: security design, RFP development, vendor selection support, project management and program oversight.
 
SMSI is also able to provide Security Management Support on an annualized basis. This means that SMSI will establish a partnership with the existing security management team by continually monitoring the efficiency of all security programs and by providing unlimited guidance and support to the onsite security personnel. SMSI will establish and encourage employee participation in need driven Security Awareness Programs as well as other workplace Crime Prevention Programs. SMSI Inc. is able to bring more than 150 years of diverse security expertise to bear on the mitigation of a wide range of security challenges. For question please visit www.smsiinc.com or call SMSI at 805/499-3800.
July 9, 2008

SMSI Inc. Consultant Honored

PRESS RELEASE
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Press Contact:                                                                                    
Vicki Moeser
phone: 703-518-1466, cell: 703-622-9516
 
ASIS International Announces the First Roy Bordes
Council Member Award of Excellence
 
Alexandria, Va. (July 9, 2008) Ronald Lander, CPP, is the first recipient of the Roy N. Bordes Council Member Award of Excellence. This award recognizes a member of ASIS International who has exhibited “selfless devotion at the volunteer level, emphasizing significant contributions at the council level over an extended period of time.” Lander is vice chairman of ASIS’ Information Technology Security Council. ASIS is the preeminent organization for security professionals worldwide.
 
Lander became an ASIS member in 1994, after retiring from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, where he was in the data systems bureau. “The mid-90s was when the Internet revolution started and Ron became active as an author and speaker for ASIS and law enforcement organizations,” wrote James Keith Flannigan, chairman of the Information Technology Security Council, in his nomination of Lander. “After realizing how unfamiliar security professionals were with the Internet and computers in general, Ron designed and presented a course on ‘Introduction to the Internet for Security Professionals.’”
 
Flannigan went on to say that as a member of the IT Security Council, Lander has attended virtually every meeting since he joined the council in the mid-1990s. “If he can’t personally make it to a meeting, he attends via the conference call,” Flannigan wrote. “He is always available to mentor new members. Whenever he gets in front of an audience, he goes out of his way to promote participation in ASIS and joining a council.”
 
The award is comprised of an all-expenses-paid trip (travel expenses, hotel accommodations and registration fee) to Atlanta for Lander to attend the ASIS International 54th Annual Seminar and Exhibits, to be held Sept. 15-18. Lander will be presented with a plaque at the closing luncheon on Sept. 18.
 
 
Lander is owner of Ultrasafe Security Specialists in Norco, Calif. High-profile estate owners, celebrities, grocery and department stores, hospitals, manufacturers, the hotel and restaurant industry, and law firms throughout the country have tapped his consulting, expert witness and integration expertise.

# # #
 
About ASIS International
ASIS International is the preeminent organization for security professionals, with more than 36,000 members worldwide. Founded in 1955, ASIS is dedicated to increasing the effectiveness and productivity of security professionals by developing educational programs and materials that address broad security interests, such as the ASIS Annual Seminar and Exhibits, as well as specific security topics. ASIS also advocates the role and value of the security management profession to business, the media, government entities and the public. By providing members and the security community with access to a full range of programs and services, and by publishing the industry’s No. 1—Security Management—ASIS leads the way for advanced and improved security performance.
 
 
May 26, 2008

SECURITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC. OFFERS A UNIQUE APPROACH TO SECURITY CONSULTATION SERVICES.

Security Management Services International, Inc. (dba SMSI Inc.) (http://www.smsiinc.com/) continues to provide security management expertise to businesses and healthcare enterprises. These services include threat and vulnerability assessments, security design and project management, and the establishment of employee involved security awareness programs. These services are provided by Board Certified Protection Professionals (CPP) certified in security management. All members of the SMSI Inc. team have more than 20 years experience in diversified security management. The essential mission is to develop programs that effectively protect persons as well as assets.
 
The President of SMSI Inc. is William Nesbitt, CPP, a security professional with more than 30 years of diverse experience. Bill is an experienced security manager having managed security operations across a broad spectrum of industries. He has provided his expertise to numerous hospitals, shopping malls, the biotech industry, and the lodging industry, to name just a few. He has testified as a forensic security expert in more than 500 litigations covering 46 states.
 
A novel and unique service offered by Security Management Services International, Inc. is their Security Management Support program: http://www.smsiinc.com/services/support.html Their Security Management Support program (SMS) provides SMSI’s clients with a high level of security management expertise on a continual basis without the accompanying payroll burden. Every business enterprise needs qualified security expertise, but some enterprises may not have needs on a daily bases. SMSI steps into this void by providing Security Management Support for existing security programs. By outsourcing security management, clients will enjoy the benefits of seasoned expertise without the expense of a high-paid in house professional.
 
How does this program work?
 
Security Management Support is initiated after completion of thorough security assessment. Once the needs of the enterprise have been established, SMSI will recommend cost effective changes and modifications. From this point forward SMSI will stand with their client by helping to improve and modify the existing security program with an eye to keeping that program relevant and effective into the future. A key element, SMSI will provide a web-based incident tracking and management system and will monitor that system so that rapid responses can be applied to ever emerging trends. SMSI’s Security Management Support program will provide experienced expertise to your security program without the addition of significant payroll burden.
 
Security Management is a dynamic enterprise.
 
This means that security programs must continually evolve. The security management team must constantly be sensitive to the early warning signs of emerging threats and vulnerabilities. This requires that every security program must establish and implement the backbone of a comprehensive computer-based security incident tracking system. This system must be designed to meet the specific needs each business or healthcare enterprise. The system, which is broadly defined as incident tracking, must have the capability of not only documenting and tracking security incidents; it must also have the capacity to track those security activities that are generally affirmative. Affirmative activities are usually documented in Daily Security Logs or Daily Activity Reports. The system must also facilitate the morphing of any Incident Report into an Investigation Report. SMSI Inc. will provide this web-based capability to its Security Management Support clients in order to ensure that the security program remains contemporary and reflective of the metrics generated by the web-based system. Both the client and SMSI will have access to this system.
 
All of the aforementioned services are available to, but not limited to the following businesses:
Ø Hospitals
Ø Hotels
Ø Office Buildings
Ø Biotech Companies
Ø Manufacturing Operation
Ø Construction Companies
Ø The Lodging Industry
Ø Shopping Centers
Ø Apartment Complexes & HOAs
Ø Sports & Entertainment Venues
 
For more information contact Bill Nesbitt, CPP at: bill@smsiinc.com or call at 805-499-3800.
March 28, 2008

California Lutheran University to Host Terrorism Presentation

Speaker and Hosted Buffet Luncheon
Topic: Militant Islamic Terrorism: Threats and Responses
 
When and where: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:30-1:30 Lundering Events Center (north campus) California Lutheran University, 60 West Olsen Rd, Thousand Oaks, Ca. (presentation will begin at approximately 12:15)
 
Speaker: James Biesterfeld, Special Agent (Ret) U.S. Army Intelligence
 
James Biesterfeld graduated with a B.A. in Education from Concordia University, River Forest, Illinois. After graduation, he joined the U.S. Army, initially as a Military Policeman. Some of his assignments included: Criminal Investigator, Ft. Belvoir, Virginia; Narcotics Investigator with the Joint Drug Suppression Team, Mannheim, Germany; and Commander of the guard, NATO, Giessen, Germany.
 
He was recruited into Military Intelligence as a Special Agent for Counterintelligence, where he was responsible for the investigation of National Security Crimes, including Counter-Espionage and Counter-Terrorism. He is a linguist in the Arabic and German languages. Some of his assignments included: Counterintelligence Activity, Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands; Senior Special Agent, Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, Saudi Arabia; and the Discreet Surveillance Detachment, Frankfurt Germany.
 
In 1994, he established Sovereign Executive Services as an investigative company. Following the events on September 11, 2001, he authored several seminars designed to assist law enforcement in their anti-terrorism efforts. He currently is under contract to the California Department of Justice, Advanced Training Center. He has trained hundreds of police officers and federal security personnel in California as well as agencies in Nevada, Florida, Nebraska and Ontario, Canada. He has recently co-authored a textbook on Post Catastrophic Event management. He also consults on matters of anti-terrorism and threats assessments to companies in the private sector.
 
Sponsored by:
 
The CLU departments of Criminal Justice and legal Studies; Graduate program in Public Policy and administration; Political Science; the CLU Center for Equality and Justice; Corporate Security Division, Amgen Inc. Newbury Park and Allied Barton Security Services Newbury Park.
 
Reservations:
Space is limited. Please RSVP before Monday, April 20 indicating the company/agency and number of persons attending (names optional). For individuals please provide names and contact information.
 
Reservations and information contact:
Dr. Robert J. Meadows, Chair, Criminal Justice and Legal Studies
Email: meadows@clunet.edu  office:  805.493.3484, fax: 805.493.3479.
March 23, 2008

The Advantage of SECURITY MANAGEMENT SUPPORT PROGRAMS

Organizations such as hospitals, office complexes, shopping centers, hotels and industrial complexes are all having to face a plethora of new challenges in order to adequately protect their employees, their clients and their assets. Those facilities such as hospitals and hotels are finding themselves on the receiving end of lawsuits when claims of inadequate security are made by patients and/or guests who have been victimized by crime while on private property. The national news media on any given day is likely to report shooting in a hospital emergency room, within a shopping mall or at an educational institution. In today’s world we cannot ignore both the threat and reality of terrorism, both domestic and international, or those that may use the ruse of terrorism to gain national attention. Across the country news outlets report abductions and sexual assaults occurring in the parking facilities of malls and hospitals.
What we do not read about in the National media is the impact resulting from the loss of assets and property within the private enterprise sector. These types of losses have a negative effect on the viability of the bottom-line for most businesses. Most of those losses result from employee dishonesty. Hospital employees who are diverting drugs to satisfy their own addiction, store clerks who are cheating both the customer and their employers by diverting revenues to their own pockets or hotel employees engaged in identity theft are all negatively impacting the industries they are employed by, in numerous deleterious ways.
Because of the examples mentioned here, and as a result of the actions of some employees, the remedies afforded by a sound security program are more important than ever. Security is a multifaceted and multidimensional discipline and therefore remedies must be need driven. Although the primary goals of most security programs are anticipatory prevention and deterrence, the means for achieving these objectives are varied and situationally determined. Security is in fact a situational discipline meaning, “one size does not fit all.”
The application of effective remedies aimed at reducing risk and mitigating losses requires experience and expertise. Security managers must understand how to integrate security programs through employee education and the proper mix of security technology and security personnel. Unfortunately many security managers do not understand this mix and may therefore depend on security vendors for guidance. Security vendors, whether they are selling the application of security technology or uniformed guards, have a natural tendency to promote their products and/or services as an end all, be all; ignoring the real needs of the customer.
Most Fortune 500 Companies, most major hotels chains and most major medical centers have highly qualified security professionals managing their security programs. Qualified security professional are usually Board Certified Protection Professionals (CPP), certified in security management. Security professionals with the CPP designation generally demand and receive six figure salaries. However, not every organization needs a fulltime Certified Protection Professional running their hospital or shopping center security program. This is especially true with small to moderately sized operations. Yet, most hospitals, shopping centers and biotech companies need the expertise of a qualified security professional to assess and analyze emerging security and loss prevention needs. The identification of these needs requires the development of customized security and loss prevention training. Procedures must be developed that require employee accountability. Remedies such as closed circuit television need to be considered and properly applied, lest they become a waste of money. This means that most organizations require a qualified security professional to become a liaison between the organization and security vendors. Security professionals are needed to monitor the security program on a regular basis in order to ensure that it remains contemporary and effective.
Security Management Services International, Inc. (SMSI Inc.)www.smsiinc.com , a California based corporation is ready to fill the gap between those organizations with a well qualified fulltime security professional and those organizations who either do not have a fulltime need, or cannot cost-justify, a full time security professional. SMSI is able to offer their clients a thorough security assessment and needs analysis. They are able to provide ongoing support to less experienced security supervisors and a cost much lower than hiring a fulltime professional with the attendant benefit package. SMSI develops Security Awareness Programs (SAP) that encourages all employees to participate in the goals of an effective security program. SMSI will help their clients develop RFPs for perspective security technological enhancements thereby ensuring cost-effective solutions. SMSI is able to provide these services for a low fixed monthly fee. This fee, when annualized is usually significantly lower that the six figure income and benefit package of a full time qualified security professional.
Credentialed security professionals bring efficiency to security programs. They understand the framework of generally accepted security standards and benchmarks. They speak the laguage of security and know the required criteria that effective security personnel must measure up to. Security professionals are continually tuned to industry best practices. By bringing professioanlism to your security program, the quality of the program will improve, and frequently the cost will go down.
All SMSI Inc. personnel are Board Certified Protection Professionals with expertise in many industries such as lodging security, healthcare security, mall security as well as biotech and industrial security, to name just a few. Many of these professionals have testified on numerous occasions as court certified security experts for litigations where plaintiffs have asserted the premises failed to provide adequate and reasonable security. This means that the SMSI professionals understand how to avoid most of these security driven lawsuits. SMSI Inc. may be contacted through their website (www.smsiinc.com) or by calling 805-499-3800.
February 26, 2008

Does Your Security Progam Meet a Reasonable Standard of Care?

Security driven lawsuits continue to cost American Businesses millions of dollars every year. Lately the evening news informs us about mall shootings, apartment complex shootings, hospital shootings, college campus shootings and school shootings, all within the last two months. Most, if not all of these crimes will eventually produce lawsuits against the owners of the various respective business enterprises and/or schools.
These litigations, which are generally classified as premises liability lawsuits will be brought against various defendants under the theory that there was inadequate security to have prevented the crime. The question then becomes, how much security would have been adequate? That question is difficult to answer. Security lawsuits are very different from most other personal injury lawsuit largely because determining a reasonable standard is not easy. In medical malpractice lawsuits the reasonable standard that was breached is often apparent. In structural defect cases, engineers can usual show a design flaw that breached the standard. The same is usually the in product liability cases. Clearly in slip and fall cases the standard is usually not difficult to ferret out. No so for security cases.
Why?: Because security is a situational discipline. The efficacy and adequacy of security for any given location or for any business are determined by a wide range of factors specific to that entity.
What are some of those factors?
The level of criminal activity
o    The level of relevant criminal activity
The level of police presence
Previous incidents
The security measure employed
o    Security officers
o    Lighting
o    Surveillance systems
o    Access management
o    The use of barriers
Recent security analysis
Notice
The list above is representative of the kinds factors that may be taken into consideration in trying to determine how much security is reasonable.
For those of you who may become victims of crime, the most fundamental security method is your behavior. The National Crime Prevention Coalition has found that about 80% of the victims of crime would not have become victims if they had exercised a little more caution. This means that crime victims have some level of responsibility to reasonably avoid threatening situations. The degree to which an alleged victim may have partially caused his or her victimhood is referred to as “contributory negligence.” For example, if you walk into a nightclub and in the course of the evening, pick a fight with another patron, and that patron beats you to a pulp, you most likely have some responsibility for your own demise.
If you ever find yourself in a security related lawsuit, whether as a defendant or a plaintiff, it is important that your legal representation has experience with this category of personal injury law.
July 7, 2007

SECURITY PROGRAMS SHOULD NOT BE LIMITED TO BELLS & WHISTLES

How does one develop a successful security program? How does one decide whether to use guards, alarms, and/or CCTV? If we decide to use guards, how many do we need? If cameras are the remedy of choice, how many are needed and where should they be located? Can a business have an effective security program without the use of security guards or cameras?

There needs to be a logical progression to be followed if the security program is to achieve the best result. Whether you are responsible for a hospital, a manufacturing operation, a hotel or a shopping center, the best security programs are derived from a thorough security assessment. Security assessments should be conducted by a qualified and objective professional. Often the use of a qualified security consultant achieves the best result because of his “outside the box” perspective. One of the biggest advantages of using a qualified Security Consultant is objectivity. If the use of a security consultant fits your needs, be sure the consultant has no ties to the security product industry, including contract guard services.

The best security programs are developed from the bottom up and not from the top down. Many security programs or security program upgrades are born out of a crisis management mind-set. A security incident occurs with little warning and panic sets in resulting in less than optimal decision making. Often the first response to an adverse event is to hire contract security guards, one of the most expensive countermeasures. Sometimes we find managers installing CCTV without any idea as to why or how cameras should be used. There is often the erroneous assumption that once cameras or alarms are installed, all risks and threats will dissipate. The tendency is to apply the most costly remedies before considering low cost solutions.

Security programs are generally targeted at the protection of people and property. The degree that one security program emphasizes people over property, or vice versa,  varies and is dependent on a wide range of site-specific factors. In most businesses the primary threat to property loss is derived from employees. Those businesses that cater to the public tend to emphasize the protection of people, in large part, because of liability exposure. Businesses that want   to provide protection to the public who frequent their premises often see the hiring of security guards or the installation of security equipment analogous to purchasing and insurance policy. This assumption can be very risky.

The use of security personnel along with security equipment can be very helpful and preventative if properly applied. However, when improperly applied, liability may actually be increased. One of the pitfalls of using security technology is that many employees may view these devices as omnipotent thereby absolving them from personal responsibility and involvement. For example, a secured hospital mother-baby unit suffers an infant abduction because a nurse holds the door open as the abductor walks off with the baby. Another example: A suspicious looking character is noticed walking about a hotel and though noticed, no one acts until after the rape occurs. A stranger walks in to a public school and molests a young boy and no employee pays attention. These examples are not exaggerations.

Security methodologies and techniques are all about behavior modification. Security programs should encourage positive behavior and discourage behavior antithetical to a safe and secure work environment. One of the most pervasive and  inherent weaknesses of many security programs is employee apathy. If hotel employees believe that security officers will protect guests and their property from harm at the exclusion of their daily involvement, they are sadly mistaken. If a hospital’s employees believe patients will be kept save by the access control system coupled with CCTV, they too are mistaken. If every staff member of a public school does not make it their responsibility to know who is on their campus, bad things can and will happen.

Clearly the most effective security program as well as one of the least expensive involves the full participation of all employees. Remember, criminals generally want anonymity. Anonymity can be denied by engaged employees.  You do not need a plethora of bells and whistles to have an effective security program. In fact before expenditures are made for bells, and whistles and security officers, a security awareness program involving all employees should be initiated. If after the security awareness program has been initiated, there are still gaps that present security risks, subsequent security expenditures will result in a far greater return on investment if employees are fully engaged. Employee vigilance is inexpensive insurance. Ongoing security awareness program increase the deterrent value of the bells and whistles. When security breaches occur, mostly likely the lack of employee vigilance was the primary weak link.

Qualified Security Consulting firms can provide the expertise needed to ensure that the Security Awareness Program required by each enterprise is developed to me a specific set of needs. Remember, Security is a situational discipline.